Our Golf Clubs Ourselves
It's part of my job -- a fun part -- to occasionally try irons. Although my swing is like one of those pop radio station promises -- you know, no repeats all day -- there's still a lot I can learn by swinging the latest innovations. I swing, I ponder, I pass the clubs on to other players at TGC for their input.
This can cause problems when I return to my own set, which of course has been fitted for me. Whatever compensations I made to get good contact out of standard-length-upright can complicate a game based on inch-long and two degrees flat. And one thing my game does not need is more complication.
O.K., enough about my game. (Proposed golf axiom: Whoever you are, nothing is more fascinating to you and more boring to the rest of the world than the details of your game.) I bring it up only as an introduction to some thoughts about who -- or what -- is really responsible for that perfectly struck 5-iron you just pushed into the bunker.
So I submit: When it's time to get bent, it's time get bent.
Your irons, that is. Or wedges. Or woods. Loft, lie angle. Shaft choice, flex, kick. Whatever.
Golf is a game of many variables. Everything from what you had for breakfast to a renegade gust of wind can divide success from failure. Why, then, have we been so thoroughly conditioned to blame ourselves every time things go wrong? You know the old saw: With everything that can go screwy in the swing and the flight of a golf ball, its astounding that anyone can do it, ever.
A more virulent strain of the It must be me disease is the tendency some golfers have to attribute all good results to luck (instead of their ability) and all bad breaks to their inadequacies alone. But if theres one thing Ive learned in years of covering golf equipment, its this:
Its not always your fault.
Yes, your gear can betray you. Poor fitting, swing changes, age, fatigue ' all these things and more can change what were once the answer to your prayers into a set of devil sticks. The real challenge for any golfer, especially those who like to fine-tune their bags, is judgment. When is it me, and when is it the gear?
And if you think about it, that fits. Golfs deepest allure rests in judgment. Hitting the ball, seeing it go where you aimed it, beating the course or your opponent ' thats all great. But the greatest obstacle, the one thats most satisfying to overcome, is judgment in everything from club selection to grip pressure. When do you pummel a drive instead of feathering an iron around the corner of the dogleg? How much do you add to the break because it hasnt rained in weeks? When do you go for it, when do you lay up? What is the wind doing, and will it do it until the ball lands? Just how good is this guy youre playing down the stretch in the city championship?
This issue, or rather the feeling you get when it arises, will not be unfamiliar to most of you. How many times have you indeed put an excellent swing on a 5-iron on a non-windy dayand seen the ball tail into a bunker? How many times have you nutted a drive and not cleared the 150 pole? You look at the club, scratch your head, feel the disconnectoh, and wait a sec, the same %$ thing happened on 8 and again on 12. Dang. I wonder if
At this point, you may do what I did and put the club down in the hitting positionand sure enough, the toe is in the air. Or the leading edge looks funny. Or something. Its always something.
But that something may not be you.
Now, in most cases, we all know that the perfect swing and the completely defective result dont always happen together. Chances are theres some combination of factors ' a slightly anemic swing, a trashy ball flight ' that come together to make you wonder. Its the recurrence of the bad result that really gets us thinking.
Well, it should. This is what drives tour players to the range after rounds. They are doing what we should do ' eliminating variables, making good swings, and watching. Watching, listening and feeling to see whats happening. I have seen golfers of all skill levels do this. Some actually talk to themselves, under their breath.
Oh, oh; I was coming at it from ' [another swing] ' thaaats better. O.K., again. [swing] Hm. Still pushing. But when I took that lesson[swing]. Push. Darn.
Now, I have as much, maybe more, tendency to blame myself than anyone. But when this last happened to me, I took my stance, looked at my irons, and there it was. You could fit a ham sandwich under the toe. These are great irons, so I wondered what could cause this. Swing change? Sure; I got flatter on purpose. Stance better? Could be. Weight loss? Maybe.
In the end, I went to my local golf shop, got some advice, and got bent. Two degrees down. The hardest part was waiting for the next chance to hit the irons. I dont know about you, but I lay awake at night worrying about this stuff. The mortgage? Who cares? Hows my seven gonna fly?
I wont bore you with the details, but so far, so good. Bottom line: Sure, take responsibility for your game. But that doesnt mean you have to take all the blame. Have the patience not to jump to conclusions. Go easy on yourself. Get information.
And when its time to get bent.
Email your thoughts to Adam Barr
Montana parents can't watch kids play high school golf
Well, this is a one new one.
According to a report from KTVQ in Montana, this line in the Montana State High School Association rule book all but forbids spectators from observing high school golf in that state:
“No spectators/fans are allowed on the course except for certain locations as designated by the tournament manager and club professional.”
Part of the issue, according to the report, is that most courses don't bother to designate those "certain locations" leaving parents unable to watch their kids compete.
“If you tell a parent that they can’t watch their kid play in the Thanksgiving Day football game, they would riot,” Chris Kelley, a high school golf parent, told KTVQ.
The report lists illegal outside coaching as one of the rule's chief motivations, but Montana State women's golf coach Brittany Basye doesn't quite buy that.
“I can go to a softball game and I can sit right behind the pitcher. I can make hand signals,” she is quoted in the report. “I can yell out names. I can do the same thing on a softball field that might affect that kid. Football games we can yell as loud as we want when someone is making a pass or a catch.”
The MHSA has argued that unlike other sports that are played in a confined area, the sprawling nature of a golf course would make it difficult to hire enough marshals to keep unruly spectators in check.
Meanwhile, there's a lawyer quoted in the report claiming this is some kind of civil rights issue.
Worth note, Montana is one of only two states that doesn't allow spectators on the course. The other state, Alaska, does not offer high school golf.
PGA Tour suspends Hensby for anti-doping violation
Mark Hensby has been suspended for one year by the PGA Tour for violating the Tour’s anti-doping policy by failing to provide a sample after notification.
The Tour made the announcement Monday, reporting that Hensby will be eligible to return on Oct. 26, 2018.
The statement reads:
The PGA Tour announced today that Mark Hensby has violated the Tour Anti-Doping Policy for failing to provide a drug testing sample after notification and has been suspended for a period of one year. He will be eligible to return on Oct. 26, 2018.
Hensby, 46, won the John Deere Classic in 2004. He played the Web.com Tour this past year, playing just 14 events. He finished 142nd on the money list. He once ranked among the top 30 in the Official World Golf Ranking but ranks No. 1,623 today.
The Sunshine Tour recently suspended player Etienne Bond for one year for failing a drug test. Players previously suspended by the PGA Tour for violating the anti-doping policy include Scott Stallings and Doug Barron.
The PGA Tour implemented revisions to its anti-doping program with the start of the 2017-18 season. The revisions include blood testing and the supplementation of the Tour’s prohibited list to include all of the substances and methods on the World Anti-Doping Agency prohibited list. As part of this season’s revisions, the Tour announced it would also begin reporting suspensions due to recreational drug use.
The Tour said it would not issue further comment on Hensby's suspension.
Good time to hang up on viewer call-ins
Golf announced the most massive layoff in the industry’s history on Monday morning.
Armchair referees around the world were given their pink slips.
It’s a glorious jettisoning of unsolicited help.
Goodbye and good riddance.
The USGA and R&A’s announcement of a new set of protocols Monday will end the practice of viewer call-ins and emails in the reporting of rules infractions.
“What we have heard from players and committees is ‘Let’s leave the rules and administration of the event to the players and those responsible for running the tournament,’” said Thomas Pagel, the USGA’s senior director of rules and amateur status.
The protocols, formed by a working group that included the PGA Tour, LPGA, European Tour, Ladies European Tour and the PGA of America, also establish the use of rules officials to monitor the televised broadcasts of events.
Additionally, the protocols will eliminate the two-shot penalty when a player signs an incorrect scorecard because the player was unaware of a violation.
Yes, I can hear you folks saying armchair rules officials help make sure every meaningful infraction comes to light. I hear you saying they make the game better, more honest, by helping reduce the possibility somebody violates the rules to win.
But at what cost?
The chaos and mayhem armchair referees create can ruin the spirit of fair play every bit as much as an unreported violation. The chaos and mayhem armchair rules officials create can be as much a threat to fair play as the violations themselves.
The Rules of Golf are devised to protect the integrity of the game, but perfectly good rules can be undermined by the manner and timeliness of their enforcement.
We have seen the intervention of armchair referees go beyond the ruin of fair play in how a tournament should be conducted. We have seen it threaten the credibility of the game in the eyes of fans who can’t fathom the stupidity of a sport that cannot separate common-sense enforcement from absolute devotion to the letter of the law.
In other sports, video review’s timely use helps officials get it right. In golf, video review too often makes it feel like the sport is getting it wrong, because timeliness matters in the spirit of fair play, because the retroactive nature of some punishments are as egregious as the violations themselves.
We saw that with Lexi Thompson at the ANA Inspiration this year.
Yes, she deserved a two-shot penalty for improperly marking her ball, but she didn’t deserve the two-shot penalty for signing an incorrect scorecard. She had no idea she was signing an incorrect scorecard.
We nearly saw the ruin of the U.S. Open at Oakmont last year, with Dustin Johnson’s victory clouded by the timing of a video review that left us all uncertain if the tournament was playing out under an incorrect scoreboard.
“What these protocols are put in place for, really, is to make sure there are measures to identify the facts as soon as possible, in real time, so if there is an issue to be dealt with, that it can be handled quickly and decisively,” Pagel said.
We have pounded the USGA for making the game more complicated and less enjoyable than it ought to be, for creating controversy where common sense should prevail, so let’s applaud executive director Mike Davis, as well as the R&A, for putting common sense in play.
Yes, this isn’t a perfect answer to handling rules violations.
There are trap doors in the protocols that we are bound to see the game stumble into, because the game is so complex, but this is more than a good faith effort to make the game better.
This is good governance.
And compared to the glacial pace of major rules change of the past, this is swift.
This is the USGA and R&A leading a charge.
We’re seeing that with the radical modernization of the Rules of Golf scheduled to take effect in 2019. We saw it with the release of Decision 34/3-10 three weeks after Thompson’s loss at the ANA, with the decision limiting video review to “reasonable judgment” and “naked eye” standards. We’re hearing it with Davis’ recent comments about the “horrible” impact distance is having on the game, leading us to wonder if the USGA is in some way gearing up to take on the golf ball.
Yes, the new video review protocols aren’t a panacea. Rules officials will still miss violations that should have been caught. There will be questions about level playing fields, about the fairness of stars getting more video review scrutiny than the rank and file. There will be questions about whether viewer complaints were relayed to rules officials.
Golf, they say, isn’t a game of perfect, and neither is rules enforcement, though these protocols make too much sense to be pilloried. They should be applauded. They should solve a lot more problems than they create.
Lexi 'applaud's USGA, R&A for rules change
Lexi Thompson’s pain may prove to be the rest of golf’s gain.
David Rickman, the R&A’s executive director of governance, acknowledged on Golf Channel’s "Morning Drive" Monday that the new protocols that will eliminate the use of TV viewer call-ins and emails to apply penalties was hastened by the controversy following Thompson’s four-shot penalty at the ANA Inspiration in early April. The new protocols also set up rules officials to monitor TV broadcasts beginning next year.
“Clearly, that case has been something of a focus point for us,” Rickman said.
Thompson reacted to the new protocols in an Instagram post.
“I applaud the USGA and the R&A for their willingness to revise the Rules of Golf to address certain unfortunate situations that have arisen several times in the game of golf,” Thompson wrote. “In my case, I am thankful no one else will have to deal with an outcome such as mine in the future.”
Thompson was penalized two shots for improperly returning her ball to its mark on a green during Saturday’s round after a viewer emailed LPGA officials during Sunday’s broadcast. She was penalized two more shots for signing an incorrect scorecard for her Saturday round. Thompson ultimately lost in a playoff to So Yeon Ryu.
The new protocols will also eliminate the additional two-shot penalty a player receives for failing to include a penalty when a player was unaware of the penalty.
Shortly after the ANA Inspiration, the USGA and R&A led the formation of a video review working group, which included the PGA Tour, LPGA, European Tour, Ladies European Tour and PGA of America.
Also, just three weeks after Thompson was hit with the four-shot penalty, the USGA and R&A released a new Rules of Golf decision decision (34-3/10) limiting video evidence in two ways:
1. If an infraction can’t be seen with the naked eye, there’s no penalty, even if video shows otherwise.
2. If a tournament committee determines that a player does “all that can be reasonably expected to make an accurate estimation or measurement” in determining a line or position to play from or to spot a ball, then there will be no penalty even if video replay later shows that to be wrong.
While the USGA and R&A said the new decision wasn’t based on Thompson’s ANA incident, LPGA players immediately began calling it the “Lexi Rule.”