Notes: No comeback plans for Sorenstam; Creamer's plane truth

By Associated PressJuly 6, 2011, 10:46 pm

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. – Annika Sorenstam’s return to the scene of her first win in a major hasn’t sparked any thoughts of a comeback.

The Hall of Famer is simply far more interested in picking up her kids than a club.

Sorenstam didn’t even pack her golf bag for her trip to the U.S. Women’s Open this week at the Broadmoor, the course where in 1995 she won the first of her 10 career majors.

Serving as an honorary chairman for the tournament, Sorenstam was her usual personable self, even hosting a clinic for kids with 13-year-old Mariel Galdiano, a qualifier from Pearl City, Hawaii, on the driving range Wednesday.

The 40-year-old Sorenstam did more socializing than swinging as she entertained the gallery.

“Once I made the decision to step away, I stepped away,” said Sorenstam, who wrapped up her career after the 2008 season. “I practice very little; I play very little.”

In March, Sorenstam gave birth to her second child, Will, who was born premature at just 27 weeks. He’s now been home for nearly two months and is up to almost 10 pounds.

Soon, he’s even going to start traveling with the family, which also includes Sorenstam’s 22-month-old daughter, Ava.

“My little buddy Will is doing great,” Sorenstam said. “It’s been a tough start for our little man, but he’s a fighter.

“Life is good. I love being a mom, and I love just the things I’m doing.”

Sorenstam still remains active in the sport even if she hardly plays. She’s set up a golf academy and foundation, along with serving on the advisory board for the LPGA.

“I’ve taken my competitive drive in a different area. I’m very competitive in the business world,” said Sorenstam, who also designs courses, has a clothing line and even is a partner in a vineyard, complete with her own signature wine. “I get my competitive fix there.”

Still, Sorenstam keeps close tabs on the tour. She’s impressed with the play of Yani Tseng, who at 22 is the youngest to win four LPGA majors.

“She has just embraced the golf world. She’s doing so many great things. She’s really taken the No. 1 spot to another level,” Sorenstam said. “She wants to be the best. She wants to be the face of the LPGA. I mean, she’s got the game.”

Not that long ago, it looked as though Michelle Wie could be the next big thing in the sport. Now 21 years old, Wie is still searching for her first victory at a major.

“When she came out there was a lot of buzz, a lot of potential from this young lady,” Sorenstam said. “I would say she has not performed to her expectations or her potential. Hopefully that will come in the next – maybe this year or the next few years to follow.”

In Sorenstam’s estimation, Wie definitely has the game to be a contender in a major. But it may boil down to commitment. Wie is also working on her degree at Stanford.

“She’s very distracted with school, doesn’t really play as much full time as I thought she would. I think she needs to come out here and compete more regularly,” Sorenstam said. “But she certainly has a lot of potential.

“The physical part is there. Sometimes, you wonder if she’s mentally strong enough to finish at the top. She has a few victories, but has not really been able to really break through, in my opinion.”


PLANE TRUTH: For Paula Creamer, one of the spoils of winning the U.S. Open last summer was her ride in an F-16 jet.

And no, she didn’t get sick, despite the jarring flight with the U.S. Air Force Thunderbirds.

“It was a great opportunity,” Creamer said.

The 24-year-old will be paired with Yani Tseng for the first two days of the tournament, a matchup Creamer likes.

“She’s the player to beat,” Creamer said. “However, it is Thursday and Friday, so you can’t dwell too much about what’s going on out there.

“That is going to be the big key: just taking care of my own business. I can’t control what she does.”


TEE PARTY: At 7,047 yards, the Broadmoor course is the longest in the history of the U.S. Women’s Open. The committee plans to adjust the tees based on the level of play over the next few days.

“We do have plans to look at some alternate teeing grounds and really make sure that it remains a stern but fair test for these players,” said Ben Kimball, the director of the U.S. Women’s Open. “I think we’ll kind of monitor what Mother Nature is giving to us, and you may see a few more things happen on the golf course.”


GRAND PRESSURE: Juli Inkster understands the pressure Yani Tseng is under this week as she attempts to complete a career grand slam.

The 51-year-old Inkster finished off the feat more than a decade ago. She said the most difficult portion may be winning the U.S. Open.

“I don’t think it’s probably the strongest field, but I think it’s the toughest one to win,” Inkster said. “You’ve got to have a golf course to your liking and you’ve got to get some breaks.

“(Tseng) is playing extremely well. She’s fearless. She’s putting good. I think that’s what’s putting her over the edge right now.”


CHIP SHOTS: Practice was suspended Wednesday afternoon because of weather. … Juli Inkster won the U.S. Women’s Open Amateur at the Broadmoor in 1982. It was her third straight crown.

Getty Images

Montana parents can't watch kids play high school golf

By Grill Room TeamDecember 11, 2017, 9:47 pm

Well, this is a one new one.

According to a report from KTVQ in Montana, this line in the Montana State High School Association rule book all but forbids spectators from observing high school golf in that state:

“No spectators/fans are allowed on the course except for certain locations as designated by the tournament manager and club professional.”

Part of the issue, according to the report, is that most courses don't bother to designate those "certain locations" leaving parents unable to watch their kids compete.

“If you tell a parent that they can’t watch their kid play in the Thanksgiving Day football game, they would riot,” Chris Kelley, a high school golf parent, told KTVQ.

The report lists illegal outside coaching as one of the rule's chief motivations, but Montana State women's golf coach Brittany Basye doesn't quite buy that.

“I can go to a softball game and I can sit right behind the pitcher. I can make hand signals,” she is quoted in the report. “I can yell out names. I can do the same thing on a softball field that might affect that kid. Football games we can yell as loud as we want when someone is making a pass or a catch.”

The MHSA has argued that unlike other sports that are played in a confined area, the sprawling nature of a golf course would make it difficult to hire enough marshals to keep unruly spectators in check.

Meanwhile, there's a lawyer quoted in the report claiming this is some kind of civil rights issue.

Worth note, Montana is one of only two states that doesn't allow spectators on the course. The other state, Alaska, does not offer high school golf.

PGA Tour suspends Hensby for anti-doping violation

By Golf Channel DigitalDecember 11, 2017, 8:02 pm

Mark Hensby has been suspended for one year by the PGA Tour for violating the Tour’s anti-doping policy by failing to provide a sample after notification.

The Tour made the announcement Monday, reporting that Hensby will be eligible to return on Oct. 26, 2018.

The statement reads:

The PGA Tour announced today that Mark Hensby has violated the Tour Anti-Doping Policy for failing to provide a drug testing sample after notification and has been suspended for a period of one year. He will be eligible to return on Oct. 26, 2018.

Hensby, 46, won the John Deere Classic in 2004. He played the Web.com Tour this past year, playing just 14 events. He finished 142nd on the money list. He once ranked among the top 30 in the Official World Golf Ranking but ranks No. 1,623 today.

The Sunshine Tour recently suspended player Etienne Bond for one year for failing a drug test. Players previously suspended by the PGA Tour for violating the anti-doping policy include Scott Stallings and Doug Barron.

The PGA Tour implemented revisions to its anti-doping program with the start of the 2017-18 season. The revisions include blood testing and the supplementation of the Tour’s prohibited list to include all of the substances and methods on the World Anti-Doping Agency prohibited list. As part of this season’s revisions, the Tour announced it would also begin reporting suspensions due to recreational drug use.

The Tour said it would not issue further comment on Hensby's suspension.

Good time to hang up on viewer call-ins

By Randall MellDecember 11, 2017, 7:40 pm

Golf announced the most massive layoff in the industry’s history on Monday morning.

Armchair referees around the world were given their pink slips.

It’s a glorious jettisoning of unsolicited help.

Goodbye and good riddance.

The USGA and R&A’s announcement of a new set of protocols Monday will end the practice of viewer call-ins and emails in the reporting of rules infractions.

“What we have heard from players and committees is ‘Let’s leave the rules and administration of the event to the players and those responsible for running the tournament,’” said Thomas Pagel, the USGA’s senior director of rules and amateur status.

Amen.

The protocols, formed by a working group that included the PGA Tour, LPGA, European Tour, Ladies European Tour and the PGA of America, also establish the use of rules officials to monitor the televised broadcasts of events.

Additionally, the protocols will eliminate the two-shot penalty when a player signs an incorrect scorecard because the player was unaware of a violation.



Yes, I can hear you folks saying armchair rules officials help make sure every meaningful infraction comes to light. I hear you saying they make the game better, more honest, by helping reduce the possibility somebody violates the rules to win.

But at what cost?

The chaos and mayhem armchair referees create can ruin the spirit of fair play every bit as much as an unreported violation. The chaos and mayhem armchair rules officials create can be as much a threat to fair play as the violations themselves.

The Rules of Golf are devised to protect the integrity of the game, but perfectly good rules can be undermined by the manner and timeliness of their enforcement.

We have seen the intervention of armchair referees go beyond the ruin of fair play in how a tournament should be conducted. We have seen it threaten the credibility of the game in the eyes of fans who can’t fathom the stupidity of a sport that cannot separate common-sense enforcement from absolute devotion to the letter of the law.

In other sports, video review’s timely use helps officials get it right. In golf, video review too often makes it feel like the sport is getting it wrong, because timeliness matters in the spirit of fair play, because the retroactive nature of some punishments are as egregious as the violations themselves.  

We saw that with Lexi Thompson at the ANA Inspiration this year.

Yes, she deserved a two-shot penalty for improperly marking her ball, but she didn’t deserve the two-shot penalty for signing an incorrect scorecard. She had no idea she was signing an incorrect scorecard.

We nearly saw the ruin of the U.S. Open at Oakmont last year, with Dustin Johnson’s victory clouded by the timing of a video review that left us all uncertain if the tournament was playing out under an incorrect scoreboard.

“What these protocols are put in place for, really, is to make sure there are measures to identify the facts as soon as possible, in real time, so if there is an issue to be dealt with, that it can be handled quickly and decisively,” Pagel said.

Amen again.

We have pounded the USGA for making the game more complicated and less enjoyable than it ought to be, for creating controversy where common sense should prevail, so let’s applaud executive director Mike Davis, as well as the R&A, for putting common sense in play.

Yes, this isn’t a perfect answer to handling rules violations.

There are trap doors in the protocols that we are bound to see the game stumble into, because the game is so complex, but this is more than a good faith effort to make the game better.

This is good governance.

And compared to the glacial pace of major rules change of the past, this is swift.

This is the USGA and R&A leading a charge.

We’re seeing that with the radical modernization of the Rules of Golf scheduled to take effect in 2019. We saw it with the release of Decision 34/3-10 three weeks after Thompson’s loss at the ANA, with the decision limiting video review to “reasonable judgment” and “naked eye” standards. We’re hearing it with Davis’ recent comments about the “horrible” impact distance is having on the game, leading us to wonder if the USGA is in some way gearing up to take on the golf ball.

Yes, the new video review protocols aren’t a panacea. Rules officials will still miss violations that should have been caught. There will be questions about level playing fields, about the fairness of stars getting more video review scrutiny than the rank and file. There will be questions about whether viewer complaints were relayed to rules officials.

Golf, they say, isn’t a game of perfect, and neither is rules enforcement, though these protocols make too much sense to be pilloried. They should be applauded. They should solve a lot more problems than they create.

Lexi 'applaud's USGA, R&A for rules change

By Randall MellDecember 11, 2017, 5:15 pm

Lexi Thompson’s pain may prove to be the rest of golf’s gain.

David Rickman, the R&A’s executive director of governance, acknowledged on Golf Channel’s "Morning Drive" Monday that the new protocols that will eliminate the use of TV viewer call-ins and emails to apply penalties was hastened by the controversy following Thompson’s four-shot penalty at the ANA Inspiration in early April. The new protocols also set up rules officials to monitor TV broadcasts beginning next year.

“Clearly, that case has been something of a focus point for us,” Rickman said.

Thompson reacted to the new protocols in an Instagram post.

“I applaud the USGA and the R&A for their willingness to revise the Rules of Golf to address certain unfortunate situations that have arisen several times in the game of golf,” Thompson wrote. “In my case, I am thankful no one else will have to deal with an outcome such as mine in the future.”

Thompson was penalized two shots for improperly returning her ball to its mark on a green during Saturday’s round after a viewer emailed LPGA officials during Sunday’s broadcast. She was penalized two more shots for signing an incorrect scorecard for her Saturday round. Thompson ultimately lost in a playoff to So Yeon Ryu.

The new protocols will also eliminate the additional two-shot penalty a player receives for failing to include a penalty when a player was unaware of the penalty.

Shortly after the ANA Inspiration, the USGA and R&A led the formation of a video review working group, which included the PGA Tour, LPGA, European Tour, Ladies European Tour and PGA of America.

Also, just three weeks after Thompson was hit with the four-shot penalty, the USGA and R&A released a new Rules of Golf decision decision (34-3/10) limiting video evidence in two ways:

1. If an infraction can’t be seen with the naked eye, there’s no penalty, even if video shows otherwise.

2. If a tournament committee determines that a player does “all that can be reasonably expected to make an accurate estimation or measurement” in determining a line or position to play from or to spot a ball, then there will be no penalty even if video replay later shows that to be wrong.

While the USGA and R&A said the new decision wasn’t based on Thompson’s ANA incident, LPGA players immediately began calling it the “Lexi Rule.”