Owen has Company in Long Line of Meltdowns
But he was thinking clearly enough in the moments afterward to realize what it meant.
'It was one of those silly mistakes I'll be remembered for, you know?' he said.
At least he has plenty of company.
Carnoustie used to be known as the toughest links in golf. Now the mere mention of the word brings back painful images of Jean Van de Velde throwing away the British Open with a combination of stupidity and bad luck.
Nick Faldo eventually got credit for one of the great closing rounds in Masters history when he shot 67, but conversation about 1996 at Augusta National always starts with the ignominious collapse of Greg Norman.
Those were majors. This was only the Bay Hill Invitational.
That won't make it any easier for Owen.
He played better than anyone Sunday at Bay Hill, 6 under par through 16 holes with a birdie from the bunker to take a one-shot lead over Rod Pampling. And when his 3-iron came up just short of the 17th, he still had a reasonable chip that he left 3 feet short of the flag.
Pampling lipped out his 10-footer for par, giving Owen a two-shot margin and only 40 inches left for par before heading to the 18th tee. Then came the meltdown. He shoved his first putt so badly that it didn't touch the cup. Wasting no time, he stood over the 2-foot putt and watched in horror as it horseshoed around the cup.
A two-shot lead became a tie.
His first PGA Tour victory - and a trip to the Masters - became a runner-up finish that will haunt him. Asked how he would cope with the loss, Owen replied, 'I'll find out tonight, but it's not going to be easy.'
'I had it in my pocket. It was there. And I threw it away,' Owen said. 'So, we'll find out. Play again next week and see what happens there.'
That would be The Players Championship, a stage built for such memorable meltdowns. Owen should remember that he played well enough over 70 holes, a tee shot and a chip to give himself a chance to win. And a solid week at Sawgrass still might be enough to get him in the Masters.
Even then, he will be the guy who took three putts in seven seconds from 40 inches to lose Bay Hill.
'It's cruel,' said Rod Pampling, the winner who spent most of his time apologizing. 'But you know, it's golf.'
Mike Reid knows the feeling as well as anyone.
He had a two-shot lead in the 1989 PGA Championship against the late Payne Stewart when he hit into the water on the 16th and had to scramble for bogey. Then, he flubbed a chip behind the 17th green and missed a 15-foot par putt to fall into a tie for the lead.
Just like Owen, Reid bent over to tap in for bogey and watched it spin out of the cup for double bogey, losing the lead and nearly losing his mind.
'It's only a game, right?' Reid said that day, choking back tears. 'Everyone can identify with failure out here.'
Van de Velde had a three-shot lead in the 1999 British Open and tried to finish with a flourish. He hit driver off the tee and got away with it when the ball found a tiny strip of grass. Instead of laying up short of Barry Burn, he boldly fired 2-iron toward the green, only to have the ball carom off a rail on the grandstand and into the burn.
He wound up with a triple bogey - making a 6-footer for that - before losing in a playoff.
'Maybe next time I'll hit the wedge,' Van de Velde said. 'And maybe you will all forgive me.'
Owen is 34, a tall Englishman with a sound game who will get another chance. But there is scar issue starting to build, starting with his three straight bogeys that cost him the final-round lead in Houston last year.
'It wasn't my day,' he said Sunday at Bay Hill. 'I'll have to wait for my day.'
Matt Gogel blew a seven-shot lead to Tiger Woods at the Pebble Beach National Pro-Am in 2000, then won the tournament two years later when Pat Perez's temper reached mercurial proportions.
Frank Lickliter didn't have to wait that long for redemption. Remember his playoff loss in the 2001 Buick Invitational? Phil Mickelson hit his tee shot into a canyon on the 17th hole at Torrey Pines, and Lickliter inexplicably hit driver and wound up in the same gorge. And yes, it got worse. After reloading off the tee, Lickliter hit wedge into 12 feet and had that bogey putt to win. He ran it 4 feet by and missed the comebacker to lose.
'I'm in shock right now,' Lickliter said. 'Other than getting a little stupid, I felt I played pretty good.'
Four months later, he captured his first PGA Tour victory at the Kemper Open.
Owen can only hope that's what the future holds for him.
As for Pampling? He got the navy blazer and a silver sword from Arnold Palmer, and his picture in the clubhouse at the Bay Hill Lodge. That might have to do, because not many will remember who won the Bay Hill Invitational in 2006.
Only who lost it.
Copyright 2006 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Montana parents can't watch kids play high school golf
Well, this is a one new one.
According to a report from KTVQ in Montana, this line in the Montana State High School Association rule book all but forbids spectators from observing high school golf in that state:
“No spectators/fans are allowed on the course except for certain locations as designated by the tournament manager and club professional.”
Part of the issue, according to the report, is that most courses don't bother to designate those "certain locations" leaving parents unable to watch their kids compete.
“If you tell a parent that they can’t watch their kid play in the Thanksgiving Day football game, they would riot,” Chris Kelley, a high school golf parent, told KTVQ.
The report lists illegal outside coaching as one of the rule's chief motivations, but Montana State women's golf coach Brittany Basye doesn't quite buy that.
“I can go to a softball game and I can sit right behind the pitcher. I can make hand signals,” she is quoted in the report. “I can yell out names. I can do the same thing on a softball field that might affect that kid. Football games we can yell as loud as we want when someone is making a pass or a catch.”
The MHSA has argued that unlike other sports that are played in a confined area, the sprawling nature of a golf course would make it difficult to hire enough marshals to keep unruly spectators in check.
Meanwhile, there's a lawyer quoted in the report claiming this is some kind of civil rights issue.
Worth note, Montana is one of only two states that doesn't allow spectators on the course. The other state, Alaska, does not offer high school golf.
PGA Tour suspends Hensby for anti-doping violation
Mark Hensby has been suspended for one year by the PGA Tour for violating the Tour’s anti-doping policy by failing to provide a sample after notification.
The Tour made the announcement Monday, reporting that Hensby will be eligible to return on Oct. 26, 2018.
The statement reads:
The PGA Tour announced today that Mark Hensby has violated the Tour Anti-Doping Policy for failing to provide a drug testing sample after notification and has been suspended for a period of one year. He will be eligible to return on Oct. 26, 2018.
Hensby, 46, won the John Deere Classic in 2004. He played the Web.com Tour this past year, playing just 14 events. He finished 142nd on the money list. He once ranked among the top 30 in the Official World Golf Ranking but ranks No. 1,623 today.
The Sunshine Tour recently suspended player Etienne Bond for one year for failing a drug test. Players previously suspended by the PGA Tour for violating the anti-doping policy include Scott Stallings and Doug Barron.
The PGA Tour implemented revisions to its anti-doping program with the start of the 2017-18 season. The revisions include blood testing and the supplementation of the Tour’s prohibited list to include all of the substances and methods on the World Anti-Doping Agency prohibited list. As part of this season’s revisions, the Tour announced it would also begin reporting suspensions due to recreational drug use.
The Tour said it would not issue further comment on Hensby's suspension.
Good time to hang up on viewer call-ins
Golf announced the most massive layoff in the industry’s history on Monday morning.
Armchair referees around the world were given their pink slips.
It’s a glorious jettisoning of unsolicited help.
Goodbye and good riddance.
The USGA and R&A’s announcement of a new set of protocols Monday will end the practice of viewer call-ins and emails in the reporting of rules infractions.
“What we have heard from players and committees is ‘Let’s leave the rules and administration of the event to the players and those responsible for running the tournament,’” said Thomas Pagel, the USGA’s senior director of rules and amateur status.
The protocols, formed by a working group that included the PGA Tour, LPGA, European Tour, Ladies European Tour and the PGA of America, also establish the use of rules officials to monitor the televised broadcasts of events.
Additionally, the protocols will eliminate the two-shot penalty when a player signs an incorrect scorecard because the player was unaware of a violation.
Yes, I can hear you folks saying armchair rules officials help make sure every meaningful infraction comes to light. I hear you saying they make the game better, more honest, by helping reduce the possibility somebody violates the rules to win.
But at what cost?
The chaos and mayhem armchair referees create can ruin the spirit of fair play every bit as much as an unreported violation. The chaos and mayhem armchair rules officials create can be as much a threat to fair play as the violations themselves.
The Rules of Golf are devised to protect the integrity of the game, but perfectly good rules can be undermined by the manner and timeliness of their enforcement.
We have seen the intervention of armchair referees go beyond the ruin of fair play in how a tournament should be conducted. We have seen it threaten the credibility of the game in the eyes of fans who can’t fathom the stupidity of a sport that cannot separate common-sense enforcement from absolute devotion to the letter of the law.
In other sports, video review’s timely use helps officials get it right. In golf, video review too often makes it feel like the sport is getting it wrong, because timeliness matters in the spirit of fair play, because the retroactive nature of some punishments are as egregious as the violations themselves.
We saw that with Lexi Thompson at the ANA Inspiration this year.
Yes, she deserved a two-shot penalty for improperly marking her ball, but she didn’t deserve the two-shot penalty for signing an incorrect scorecard. She had no idea she was signing an incorrect scorecard.
We nearly saw the ruin of the U.S. Open at Oakmont last year, with Dustin Johnson’s victory clouded by the timing of a video review that left us all uncertain if the tournament was playing out under an incorrect scoreboard.
“What these protocols are put in place for, really, is to make sure there are measures to identify the facts as soon as possible, in real time, so if there is an issue to be dealt with, that it can be handled quickly and decisively,” Pagel said.
We have pounded the USGA for making the game more complicated and less enjoyable than it ought to be, for creating controversy where common sense should prevail, so let’s applaud executive director Mike Davis, as well as the R&A, for putting common sense in play.
Yes, this isn’t a perfect answer to handling rules violations.
There are trap doors in the protocols that we are bound to see the game stumble into, because the game is so complex, but this is more than a good faith effort to make the game better.
This is good governance.
And compared to the glacial pace of major rules change of the past, this is swift.
This is the USGA and R&A leading a charge.
We’re seeing that with the radical modernization of the Rules of Golf scheduled to take effect in 2019. We saw it with the release of Decision 34/3-10 three weeks after Thompson’s loss at the ANA, with the decision limiting video review to “reasonable judgment” and “naked eye” standards. We’re hearing it with Davis’ recent comments about the “horrible” impact distance is having on the game, leading us to wonder if the USGA is in some way gearing up to take on the golf ball.
Yes, the new video review protocols aren’t a panacea. Rules officials will still miss violations that should have been caught. There will be questions about level playing fields, about the fairness of stars getting more video review scrutiny than the rank and file. There will be questions about whether viewer complaints were relayed to rules officials.
Golf, they say, isn’t a game of perfect, and neither is rules enforcement, though these protocols make too much sense to be pilloried. They should be applauded. They should solve a lot more problems than they create.
Lexi 'applaud's USGA, R&A for rules change
Lexi Thompson’s pain may prove to be the rest of golf’s gain.
David Rickman, the R&A’s executive director of governance, acknowledged on Golf Channel’s "Morning Drive" Monday that the new protocols that will eliminate the use of TV viewer call-ins and emails to apply penalties was hastened by the controversy following Thompson’s four-shot penalty at the ANA Inspiration in early April. The new protocols also set up rules officials to monitor TV broadcasts beginning next year.
“Clearly, that case has been something of a focus point for us,” Rickman said.
Thompson reacted to the new protocols in an Instagram post.
“I applaud the USGA and the R&A for their willingness to revise the Rules of Golf to address certain unfortunate situations that have arisen several times in the game of golf,” Thompson wrote. “In my case, I am thankful no one else will have to deal with an outcome such as mine in the future.”
Thompson was penalized two shots for improperly returning her ball to its mark on a green during Saturday’s round after a viewer emailed LPGA officials during Sunday’s broadcast. She was penalized two more shots for signing an incorrect scorecard for her Saturday round. Thompson ultimately lost in a playoff to So Yeon Ryu.
The new protocols will also eliminate the additional two-shot penalty a player receives for failing to include a penalty when a player was unaware of the penalty.
Shortly after the ANA Inspiration, the USGA and R&A led the formation of a video review working group, which included the PGA Tour, LPGA, European Tour, Ladies European Tour and PGA of America.
Also, just three weeks after Thompson was hit with the four-shot penalty, the USGA and R&A released a new Rules of Golf decision decision (34-3/10) limiting video evidence in two ways:
1. If an infraction can’t be seen with the naked eye, there’s no penalty, even if video shows otherwise.
2. If a tournament committee determines that a player does “all that can be reasonably expected to make an accurate estimation or measurement” in determining a line or position to play from or to spot a ball, then there will be no penalty even if video replay later shows that to be wrong.
While the USGA and R&A said the new decision wasn’t based on Thompson’s ANA incident, LPGA players immediately began calling it the “Lexi Rule.”