Length No Gauge to Courses Worth

By George WhiteAugust 30, 2005, 4:00 pm
Bash it and go find it. And bash it again.
 
Sounds monotonous, doesnt it? Augusta National just announced another lengthening. A par-5 at Baltusrol was 650 yards ' 650 yards! Even venerable old St. Andrews is getting in on the act ' No. 14 was lengthened 40 yards in the recent big party, to 618 yards.
 
The driver is one of 14 clubs in a professionals bag. Its just one option from the tee box. There are the other fairway woods and there are the long irons. Each should also be an option. But its not really feasible now. Its totally a bashers game. If you dont rip it into the next time zone, you seldom win ' simple as that.
 
17th Hole - Baltusrol GC
Baltusrol's 17th hole played at 650 yards during the PGA Championship.
Michael Campbell laments the changes, the fiddling with golf courses to make them longer and longer. He laments it, of course, because he is just of average length. But he also laments it because golf is dangerously close to becoming a most boring sport, one where the pros merely knock the doo-waddling stuffing out of the ball, go find it, and then wedge it onto the green. And he laments it because it has taken so many good players out of the game.
 
He realizes, of course, that players are getting stronger and more muscular. And he realizes that equipment ' golf balls and clubs - have been radically improved. He realizes that agronomy is much better today than it was even 10 years ago, that fairways are more closely cropped today and the turf is vastly better. But he thinks that simply lengthening a hole to stupendous lengths is the wrong approach.
 
The solution is not to lengthen the hole, says the U.S. Open champ. It (the solution) is to toughen the actual design of the golf hole rather than lengthen the hole, I believe.
 
Length is obviously not the solution. Design of the golf hole is the solution to the problem here.
 
For example, he says, pinching in the fairways in the landing area of the big knockers will cause some serious mind games to start whirring. Can I force this club into that narrow area? Or would a more prudent play be to take a lesser club and lay back a little, making sure of getting the ball in play?
 
Yeah, it's a shame, really, Campbell says. Look at 14 at St. Andrews. Instead of putting it (the tee) back 40 yards, put two bunkers very close together 300 out and let them try and feed the ball through the gap.
 
I hit driver, 4-iron there I think on the practice day technology has helped all of us, but it's doing it the wrong way by toughening the golf courses up through length rather than toughness of the greens or the design of the hole.
 
And a lot of the supreme shotmakers are now just numbers in the field ' guys whom the game has passed by. Nick Faldo. Corey Pavin. Nick Price. And to an extent ' Campbell. These are players who learned their swings to work the ball, to be precise in their distances. Now, the premium is on something totally different ' raw length. And its too late for these gents to go back and totally retool their swats.
 
I think they should put a stop to something because it's getting ridiculous now, he said. It's just a smash, as I said before. There's no controlled shots now.
 
Nick Faldo - asked him about technology, how he can't compete anymore because he hasn't the power game for it. He's got the finesse. Every golf course that's 300 yards shorter, he'll be great, but right now he's 20 yards behind me or 10 yards behind me. He'd be 70 yards behind Tiger. He's hitting wedge to a par 4 and Nick's hitting 3-iron to a par 4.
 
You can't compete with that. That's why the likes of Faldo and a few other guys haven't competed because their games, back in the '80s and early '90s were great, but not in the 21st century.
 
Dont ask the course architects to stop the power grab. Architects have to get paid, you know, and the people who are paying the bills are demanding courses which are longer and longer.
 
They're just following instructions, said Campbell. Imagine being on another golf course. Say if I build a golf course in 2010 for a scenario, and I design a golf hole to be the longest par 4 or the longest par 5 in the world. That's a little notch in my little thing, you know, to actually achieve that.
 
But it'll be beaten in probably another six months' time, just like building the highest building in the world. As soon as one goes up, another year later, somebody else tops it. It's just human nature.
 
The fourth hole at Augusta is a par-3 - which is now going to be 213 yards - to a narrow green guarded by a deep bunker. Campbell says theyve taken the joy out of playing the course by continually ramping up the length.
 
It's no fun there. It's just a smash, just a slog. It's a power game. There's no finesse in the game, he says.

Campbell says he isnt going to be playing professional golf much longer. So, to him personally, its really almost a moot point.
 
I could retire by seven years' time - so 2012, he declares. After that, I don't really care, to be honest.
 
That isnt entirely truthful, to be honest. He cares a lot. But the people who matter dont. And those people hold the games future in their hands.
 
Email your thoughts to George White
Getty Images

Montana parents can't watch kids play high school golf

By Grill Room TeamDecember 11, 2017, 9:47 pm

Well, this is a one new one.

According to a report from KTVQ in Montana, this line in the Montana State High School Association rule book all but forbids spectators from observing high school golf in that state:

“No spectators/fans are allowed on the course except for certain locations as designated by the tournament manager and club professional.”

Part of the issue, according to the report, is that most courses don't bother to designate those "certain locations" leaving parents unable to watch their kids compete.

“If you tell a parent that they can’t watch their kid play in the Thanksgiving Day football game, they would riot,” Chris Kelley, a high school golf parent, told KTVQ.

The report lists illegal outside coaching as one of the rule's chief motivations, but Montana State women's golf coach Brittany Basye doesn't quite buy that.

“I can go to a softball game and I can sit right behind the pitcher. I can make hand signals,” she is quoted in the report. “I can yell out names. I can do the same thing on a softball field that might affect that kid. Football games we can yell as loud as we want when someone is making a pass or a catch.”

The MHSA has argued that unlike other sports that are played in a confined area, the sprawling nature of a golf course would make it difficult to hire enough marshals to keep unruly spectators in check.

Meanwhile, there's a lawyer quoted in the report claiming this is some kind of civil rights issue.

Worth note, Montana is one of only two states that doesn't allow spectators on the course. The other state, Alaska, does not offer high school golf.

PGA Tour suspends Hensby for anti-doping violation

By Golf Channel DigitalDecember 11, 2017, 8:02 pm

Mark Hensby has been suspended for one year by the PGA Tour for violating the Tour’s anti-doping policy by failing to provide a sample after notification.

The Tour made the announcement Monday, reporting that Hensby will be eligible to return on Oct. 26, 2018.

The statement reads:

The PGA Tour announced today that Mark Hensby has violated the Tour Anti-Doping Policy for failing to provide a drug testing sample after notification and has been suspended for a period of one year. He will be eligible to return on Oct. 26, 2018.

Hensby, 46, won the John Deere Classic in 2004. He played the Web.com Tour this past year, playing just 14 events. He finished 142nd on the money list. He once ranked among the top 30 in the Official World Golf Ranking but ranks No. 1,623 today.

The Sunshine Tour recently suspended player Etienne Bond for one year for failing a drug test. Players previously suspended by the PGA Tour for violating the anti-doping policy include Scott Stallings and Doug Barron.

The PGA Tour implemented revisions to its anti-doping program with the start of the 2017-18 season. The revisions include blood testing and the supplementation of the Tour’s prohibited list to include all of the substances and methods on the World Anti-Doping Agency prohibited list. As part of this season’s revisions, the Tour announced it would also begin reporting suspensions due to recreational drug use.

The Tour said it would not issue further comment on Hensby's suspension.

Good time to hang up on viewer call-ins

By Randall MellDecember 11, 2017, 7:40 pm

Golf announced the most massive layoff in the industry’s history on Monday morning.

Armchair referees around the world were given their pink slips.

It’s a glorious jettisoning of unsolicited help.

Goodbye and good riddance.

The USGA and R&A’s announcement of a new set of protocols Monday will end the practice of viewer call-ins and emails in the reporting of rules infractions.

“What we have heard from players and committees is ‘Let’s leave the rules and administration of the event to the players and those responsible for running the tournament,’” said Thomas Pagel, the USGA’s senior director of rules and amateur status.

Amen.

The protocols, formed by a working group that included the PGA Tour, LPGA, European Tour, Ladies European Tour and the PGA of America, also establish the use of rules officials to monitor the televised broadcasts of events.

Additionally, the protocols will eliminate the two-shot penalty when a player signs an incorrect scorecard because the player was unaware of a violation.



Yes, I can hear you folks saying armchair rules officials help make sure every meaningful infraction comes to light. I hear you saying they make the game better, more honest, by helping reduce the possibility somebody violates the rules to win.

But at what cost?

The chaos and mayhem armchair referees create can ruin the spirit of fair play every bit as much as an unreported violation. The chaos and mayhem armchair rules officials create can be as much a threat to fair play as the violations themselves.

The Rules of Golf are devised to protect the integrity of the game, but perfectly good rules can be undermined by the manner and timeliness of their enforcement.

We have seen the intervention of armchair referees go beyond the ruin of fair play in how a tournament should be conducted. We have seen it threaten the credibility of the game in the eyes of fans who can’t fathom the stupidity of a sport that cannot separate common-sense enforcement from absolute devotion to the letter of the law.

In other sports, video review’s timely use helps officials get it right. In golf, video review too often makes it feel like the sport is getting it wrong, because timeliness matters in the spirit of fair play, because the retroactive nature of some punishments are as egregious as the violations themselves.  

We saw that with Lexi Thompson at the ANA Inspiration this year.

Yes, she deserved a two-shot penalty for improperly marking her ball, but she didn’t deserve the two-shot penalty for signing an incorrect scorecard. She had no idea she was signing an incorrect scorecard.

We nearly saw the ruin of the U.S. Open at Oakmont last year, with Dustin Johnson’s victory clouded by the timing of a video review that left us all uncertain if the tournament was playing out under an incorrect scoreboard.

“What these protocols are put in place for, really, is to make sure there are measures to identify the facts as soon as possible, in real time, so if there is an issue to be dealt with, that it can be handled quickly and decisively,” Pagel said.

Amen again.

We have pounded the USGA for making the game more complicated and less enjoyable than it ought to be, for creating controversy where common sense should prevail, so let’s applaud executive director Mike Davis, as well as the R&A, for putting common sense in play.

Yes, this isn’t a perfect answer to handling rules violations.

There are trap doors in the protocols that we are bound to see the game stumble into, because the game is so complex, but this is more than a good faith effort to make the game better.

This is good governance.

And compared to the glacial pace of major rules change of the past, this is swift.

This is the USGA and R&A leading a charge.

We’re seeing that with the radical modernization of the Rules of Golf scheduled to take effect in 2019. We saw it with the release of Decision 34/3-10 three weeks after Thompson’s loss at the ANA, with the decision limiting video review to “reasonable judgment” and “naked eye” standards. We’re hearing it with Davis’ recent comments about the “horrible” impact distance is having on the game, leading us to wonder if the USGA is in some way gearing up to take on the golf ball.

Yes, the new video review protocols aren’t a panacea. Rules officials will still miss violations that should have been caught. There will be questions about level playing fields, about the fairness of stars getting more video review scrutiny than the rank and file. There will be questions about whether viewer complaints were relayed to rules officials.

Golf, they say, isn’t a game of perfect, and neither is rules enforcement, though these protocols make too much sense to be pilloried. They should be applauded. They should solve a lot more problems than they create.

Lexi 'applaud's USGA, R&A for rules change

By Randall MellDecember 11, 2017, 5:15 pm

Lexi Thompson’s pain may prove to be the rest of golf’s gain.

David Rickman, the R&A’s executive director of governance, acknowledged on Golf Channel’s "Morning Drive" Monday that the new protocols that will eliminate the use of TV viewer call-ins and emails to apply penalties was hastened by the controversy following Thompson’s four-shot penalty at the ANA Inspiration in early April. The new protocols also set up rules officials to monitor TV broadcasts beginning next year.

“Clearly, that case has been something of a focus point for us,” Rickman said.

Thompson reacted to the new protocols in an Instagram post.

“I applaud the USGA and the R&A for their willingness to revise the Rules of Golf to address certain unfortunate situations that have arisen several times in the game of golf,” Thompson wrote. “In my case, I am thankful no one else will have to deal with an outcome such as mine in the future.”

Thompson was penalized two shots for improperly returning her ball to its mark on a green during Saturday’s round after a viewer emailed LPGA officials during Sunday’s broadcast. She was penalized two more shots for signing an incorrect scorecard for her Saturday round. Thompson ultimately lost in a playoff to So Yeon Ryu.

The new protocols will also eliminate the additional two-shot penalty a player receives for failing to include a penalty when a player was unaware of the penalty.

Shortly after the ANA Inspiration, the USGA and R&A led the formation of a video review working group, which included the PGA Tour, LPGA, European Tour, Ladies European Tour and PGA of America.

Also, just three weeks after Thompson was hit with the four-shot penalty, the USGA and R&A released a new Rules of Golf decision decision (34-3/10) limiting video evidence in two ways:

1. If an infraction can’t be seen with the naked eye, there’s no penalty, even if video shows otherwise.

2. If a tournament committee determines that a player does “all that can be reasonably expected to make an accurate estimation or measurement” in determining a line or position to play from or to spot a ball, then there will be no penalty even if video replay later shows that to be wrong.

While the USGA and R&A said the new decision wasn’t based on Thompson’s ANA incident, LPGA players immediately began calling it the “Lexi Rule.”