Champion Golfer of the Year - COPIED

By Mercer BaggsJuly 14, 2008, 4:00 pm
Open ChampionshipDid you know that the asterisk comes in many forms? Theres the six-pronged star, the 16-pronged star, the Arabic star, the Japanese rice star, and so on and so on.
 
Its good to have these many symbols, because the asterisk has many meanings. According to Wikipedia ' the worlds foremost authority on asterisks and everything else (for those of us too lazy to actually do research) ' it was originally intended to indicate ones date of birth. You can now use it to:
 
*Call out a footnote ' Abraham Lincoln loved going to Fords Theatre*
*Avoid offending people (can I write jerk face or do I need to do it j**k face?)
*Offer anonymity ' Mr. ***** Woods (James Woods?)
*Provide emphasis ' I *love* monkeys
*To list silly items like these
 
When we think about an asterisk today, however, one thing comes to mind: ignominy. We cant help but associate an * the size of Barry Bonds bulbous head with his 762 home runs. Ford Frick wanted one for Roger Maris 61 in 61. I want one for the entire Ron Zook era at Florida.
 
And now, people ' fans, media, and even some players ' are saying that the winner of this weeks Open Championship should have a * after his name.
 
Two words: total c***p.
 
Now, if youre saying this tournament deserves an asterisk as a footnote, because it was played without Tiger Woods, I can buy that. It will be impossible for us not to remember the fact that this major, as well as the upcoming PGA Championship, will be contested without the greatest player who ever lived.
 
But, if youre saying the winner isnt legit, because Woods didnt compete, and therefore is not a worthy champion, again: total c**p.
 
The Champion Golfer for 2008 deserves to hold the claret jug high and chug whatever he wants to out of it without reserve. The player with the lowest score over four rounds (or more) deserves to be regarded as a true major champion, not someone who won only because Woods wasnt present.
 
A debate, however, will persist regardless of who wins as to whether or not a * should be attached to his name.
 
If that name is Phil Mickelson or Ernie Els or some other proven major champion, some will say they wouldnt have been able to add to their major tally had Tiger been in contention. But whos to say that Tiger would have been in contention anyway? He may well have been, but there arent any guarantees.
 
If that name is Peter Hansen or Soren Hanson or some other shocking victor, some will say thats what you get when Tigers not around. Tiger played in 2003 when Ben Curtis won. And Im pretty sure he was there in 2004 when Todd Hamilton prevailed.
 
If that name is Sergio Garcia or Adam Scott or some other player fans have been waiting to claim a maiden major title, some will say theyre not truly major winners until they beat a field which includes Tiger.
 
Hunter Mahan feels this way.
 
Think of Adam Scott and Sergio, said Mahan. But if they do win, there will be an asterisk because Tiger wasn't there. They're going to be the Houston Rockets of the mid-90s when they won back-to-back titles after Michael Jordan retired.
 
Justin Rose shares that attitude.
 
If I was to win the British Open thered be an asterisk next to it: Tiger Woods not in field. You know what I mean? Rose has said.
 
Obviously, Tiger affects a field when he competes, particularly in a major championship. The fact that he wont be at Royal Birkdale means that no one has to search to find his name on the yellow score board, and maybe it frees up certain players to focus on their own games and not worry about what hes doing (see Els).
 
But a major win is a major win, and a major champion should be regarded as such without attaching a big but .
 
Upon winning THE PLAYERS Championship, Sergio Garcia said that he wanted to thank Tiger for not being there. There might have been some truth to that, but the statement was made mostly in jest.
 
Does anyone diminish Garcias victory because he didnt have to beat Tiger? Does it ever cross your mind that Garcia won a Tiger-less PLAYERS?
 
It shouldnt. And it shouldnt cross your mind when you talk about the eventual 2008 Open champion. Tiger not playing is a footnote for the tournament; not an asterisk of Scarlet Letter proportions made to wear by the winner.
 
As for contestants at Royal Birkdale worried that a possible triumph might forever be tainted by Tigers absence, here are two more words for you:
 
Go home.
 
Related Links:
  • Full Coverage - Open Championship
  • GOLF CHANNEL Airtimes
  • Getty Images

    Monty grabs lead entering final round in season-opener

    By Associated PressJanuary 20, 2018, 4:00 am

    KAILUA-KONA, Hawaii – Colin Montgomerie shot a second straight 7-under 65 to take a two-shot lead into the final round of the Mitsubishi Electric Championship, the season opener on the PGA Tour Champions.

    The 54-year-old Scot, a six-time winner on the over-50 tour, didn't miss a fairway on Friday and made five birdies on the back nine to reach 14 under at Hualalai.

    Montgomerie has made 17 birdies through 36 holes and said he will have to continue cashing in on his opportunities.

    ''We know that I've got to score something similar to what I've done – 66, 67, something like that, at least,'' Montgomerie said. ''You know the competition out here is so strong that if you do play away from the pins, you'll get run over. It's tough, but hey, it's great.''


    Full-field scores from the Mitsubishi Electric Championship


    First-round co-leaders Gene Sauers and Jerry Kelly each shot 68 and were 12 under.

    ''I hit the ball really well. You know, all the putts that dropped yesterday didn't drop today,'' Kelly said. ''I was just short and burning edges. It was good putting again. They just didn't go in.''

    David Toms was three shots back after a 66. Woody Austin, Mark Calcavecchia and Doug Garwood each shot 67 and were another shot behind.

    Bernhard Langer, defending the first of his seven 2017 titles, was six shots back after a 67.

    The limited-field tournament on Hawaii's Big Island includes last season's winners, past champions of the event, major champions and Hall of Famers.

    ''We've enjoyed ourselves thoroughly here,'' Montgomerie said. ''It's just a dramatic spot, isn't it? If you don't like this, well, I'm sorry, take a good look in the mirror, you know?''

    Getty Images

    The missing link: Advice from successful tour pros

    By Phil BlackmarJanuary 20, 2018, 1:24 am

    Today’s topic is significant in that it underscores the direction golf is headed, a direction that has me a little concerned.

    Now, more than ever, it has become the norm for PGA Tour players to put together a team to assist in all aspects of their career. These teams can typically include the player’s swing coach, mental coach, manager, workout specialist, dietician, physical therapist, short-game guru, doctor, accountant, nanny and wife. Though it often concerns me the player may be missing out when others are making decisions for them, that is not the topic.

    I want to talk about what most players seem to be inexplicably leaving off their teams.

    One of the things that separates great players from the rest of the pack – other than talent – is the great player’s ability to routinely stay comfortable and play with focus and clarity in all situations. Though innate to many, this skill is trainable and can be learned. Don’t get too excited, the details of such a plan are too long and more suited for a book than the short confines of this article.

    So, if that aspect of the game is so important, where is the representative on the player’s team who has stood on the 18th tee with everything on the line? Where is the representative on the team who has experienced, over and over, what the player will be experiencing? In other words, where is the successful former tour player on the team?

    You look to tennis and many players have such a person on their team. These teacher/mentors include the likes of Boris Becker, Ivan Lendl, Jimmy Connors and Brad Gilbert. Why is it not the norm in golf?

    Sure, a few players have sought out the advice of Jack Nicklaus, but he’s not part of a team. The teaching ranks also include some former players like Butch Harmon and a few others. But how many teams include a player who has contended in a major, let alone won one or more?

    I’m not here to argue the value and knowledge of all the other coaches who make up a player’s team. But how can the value of a successful tour professional be overlooked? If I’m going to ask someone what I should do in various situations on the course, I would prefer to include the experienced knowledge of players who have been there themselves.

    This leads me to the second part of today’s message. Is there a need for the professional players to mix with professional teachers to deliver the best and most comprehensive teaching philosophy to average players? I feel there is.

    Most lessons are concerned with changing the student’s swing. Often, this is done with little regard for how it feels to the student because the teacher believes the information is correct and more important than the “feels” of the student. “Stick with it until it’s comfortable” is often the message. This directive methodology was put on Twitter for public consumption a short time back:

    On the other hand, the professional player is an expert at making a score and understands the intangible side of the game. The intangible side says: “Mechanics cannot stand alone in making a good player.” The intangible side understands “people feel things differently”; ask Jim Furyk to swing like Dustin Johnson, or vice versa. This means something that looks good to us may not feel right to someone else.

    The intangible side lets us know that mechanics and feels must walk together in order for the player to succeed. From Ben Hogan’s book:

    “What I have learned I have learned by laborious trial and error, watching a good player do something that looked right to me, stumbling across something that felt right to me, experimenting with that something to see if it helped or hindered, adopting it if it helped, refining it sometimes, discarding it if it didn’t help, sometimes discarding it later if it proved undependable in competition, experimenting continually with new ideas and old ideas and all manner of variations until I arrived at a set of fundamentals that appeared to me to be right because they accomplished a very definite purpose, a set of fundamentals which proved to me they were right because they stood up and produced under all kinds of pressure.”

    Hogan beautifully described the learning process that could develop the swings of great players like DJ, Furyk, Lee Trevino, Jordan Spieth, Nicklaus, etc.

    Bob Toski is still teaching. Steve Elkington is helping to bring us the insight of Jackie Burke. Hal Sutton has a beautiful teaching facility outside of Houston. And so on. Just like mechanics and feels, it’s not either-or – the best message comes from both teachers and players.

    Lately, it seems the scale has swung more to one side; let us not forget the value of insights brought to us by the players who have best mastered the game.

    Getty Images

    Woods, Rahm, Rickie, J-Day headline Torrey field

    By Golf Channel DigitalJanuary 20, 2018, 12:47 am

    Tiger Woods is set to make his 2018 debut.

    Woods is still part of the final field list for next week’s Farmers Insurance Open, the headliner of a tournament that includes defending champion Jon Rahm, Hideki Matsuyama, Justin Rose, Rickie Fowler, Phil Mickelson and Jason Day.

    In all, 12 of the top 26 players in the world are teeing it up at Torrey Pines.

    Though Woods has won eight times at Torrey Pines, he hasn’t broken 71 in his past seven rounds there and hasn’t played all four rounds since 2013, when he won. Last year he missed the cut after rounds of 76-72, then lasted just one round in Dubai before he withdrew with back spasms.

    After a fourth back surgery, Woods didn’t return to competition until last month’s Hero World Challenge, where he tied for ninth. 

    Woods has committed to play both the Farmers Insurance Open and next month's Genesis Open at Riviera, which benefits his foundation. 

    Getty Images

    Even on 'off' day, Rahm shoots 67 at CareerBuilder

    By Ryan LavnerJanuary 20, 2018, 12:36 am

    Jon Rahm didn’t strike the ball as purely Friday as he did during his opening round at the CareerBuilder Challenge.

    He still managed a 5-under 67 that put him just one shot off the lead heading into the weekend.

    “I expected myself to go to the range (this morning) and keep flushing everything like I did yesterday,” said Rahm, who shot a career-low 62 at La Quinta on Thursday. “Everything was just a little bit off. It was just one of those days.”


    Full-field scores from the Career Builder Challenge

    CareerBuilder Challenge: Articles, photos and videos


    After going bogey-free on Thursday, Rahm mixed four birdies and two bogeys over his opening six holes. He managed to settle down around the turn, then made two birdies on his final three holes to move within one shot of Andrew Landry (65).

    Rahm has missed only five greens through two rounds and sits at 15-under 129. 

    The 23-year-old Spaniard won in Dubai to end the year and opened 2018 with a runner-up finish at the Sentry Tournament of Champions. He needs a top-6 finish or better this week to supplant Jordan Spieth as the No. 2 player in the world.