Tiger Great Federer a Bit Better

By Mercer BaggsJanuary 29, 2007, 5:00 pm
Tiger Woods is without peer. Thats the popular notion. But there is one active player who might not only be Tigers equal, but perhaps his superior.
 
He just happens to play another sport.
 
Roger Federer is to tennis what Woods is to golf: a man so dominant that he is not only the best of his generation, but may one day be considered the greatest of all time.
 
Tiger Woods
Tiger Woods watches Roger Federer win last year's U.S. Open. (WireImage)
Federer is as currently incomparable in his sport as Tiger is in his. But who between the two is better? Whose accomplishments are more impressive?
 
Obviously, both men can state a mighty strong case. The numbers for each man border on absurd.
 
Woods has 55 wins on his primary tour and 12 major championship victories. Federer, who turned pro two years after Woods, has 46 singles victories and 10 grand slam titles.
 
Both men are currently No. 1 in their respective sports by massive margins. Woods holds golfs record for most consecutive weeks on top; Federer is guaranteed to race past Jimmy Connors mark in just a few weeks.
 
Tiger won this past week's Buick Invitational to extend his PGA TOUR winning streak to a personal best seven. Roger won this past week's Australian Open to run his match winning streak to a personal best 36.
 
I could sit here and recite each mans accomplishments until I grew a ZZ Top beard. But I'll give way to time and brevity and say simply: Tiger and Roger are above and beyond everyone else ' except each other.
 
Woods first met Federer (theyre both IMG clients) last year when the latter won the U.S. Open. And, in the It Takes One to Know One department, the two sporting icons developed a friendship.
 
Its not a buddy-buddy, call-you-on-the-weekend kind of relationship. Its one based on mutual respect, and even a bit of awe.
 
So, whos better in his respective sport, the more dominant figure? Thats purely subjective, and you can't really go wrong either way. The humble Federer, who is almost six years younger, would probably say Woods. And when Tiger was voted 2006 AP Male Athlete of the Year he responded by saying: 'What (Federers) done in tennis, I think, is far greater than what I've done in golf. He's lost what ... five matches in three years? That's pretty good.'
 
My subjective viewpoint: Federer gets a slight nod.
 
I give the advantage to Federer primarily because tennis is a match-play sport. You have to beat an individual head-to-head in every match in order to win.
 
Many will argue that it is more difficult to beat a field of 156 to win a tournament instead of just beating seven or so players on your way to a title. But I disagree.
 
This would be the case if you were just talking about playing one round. But when you spread an event out over the course of 72 holes, you don't have to be the best every day, just the best over four days.
 
In tennis, however, you have to be the better man each day -- better than the man on the opposite side of the net.
 
Of course, Federer, like Woods, doesnt always have to be at his best in order to win. He has the talent to give a sub-par performance and still stomp -- or intimidate -- the jelly out of his opponent.
 
But what if golf was match play all the time? What if every tournament was like the WGC-Match Play Championship? Would Tiger win as much as he does in stroke-play events?
 
I dont think so.
 
Woods has won the WGC-Match Play twice. And if every event was contested under a match-play format, he would still win more than anyone else on the PGA TOUR. But I dont think he would be as dominant as he is in stroke play.
 
To make things a little more equivalent, since the men play a best 3-out-of-5 sets in grand slam events, golf majors could be 36 holes of match play each day. That would certainly benefit Tiger, in relation to fitness and the fact that the better player usually prevails over a longer contest.
 
But, all in all, I think its easier for Woods to win over the course of four medal-play rounds than it is for him to win by beating a single opponent head-to-head each day.
 
The underdog always has a greater chance of winning in the short run.
 
Most sports fans know who Roger Federer is, but not too many ' at least in the U.S. ' know how great he truly is. And if you're not overly familiar with him, take a look at his bio page on wikipedia.org. Raymond Babbitt couldn't calculate those numbers.
 
Roger Federer
Roger Federer is four behind Pete Sampras on the all-time grand slam wins list. (WireImage)
Federer isn't truly appreciated by many in the States for a few reasons. First of all, he's not American, and, as Englishman Luke Donald accurately pointed out a few years ago, Americans are 'quite insular.'
 
Two, tennis has lost a lot of popularity over here, as there are no great U.S. champions at the moment. And, unless we're the best at something, then the sport doesn't really matter.
 
Thirdly, Federer just happens to be a decent person. Swiss-born, hes relatively quite and demur, not one to boast or throw tantrums. In America, all too often, we only seem to care about the sound and the fury of an athlete, not their significance.
 
Federer, on the other hand, is more interested in adding to his trophy case than increasing his Q rating. And, because of that, he only makes headlines when he wins ' particularly when he wins a grand slam event, because thats the only time many people ever pay attention to mens tennis.
 
And win he does ' a lot.
 
Federer was once quoted as saying: I can cope with losing much easier than I used to. I used to cry very much and be very disappointed.
 
Defeat is easy to handle when it's seldom experienced.
 
Since the start of 2004, Federers official record is 254-17. Thats a 94.4 percent winning percentage. Hes also won nine of 13 grand slam titles during this stretch. Last year, he went 92-5, with four of those losses coming to one opponent, Rafael Nadal.
 
One of those Nadal defeats came in the finals of the French Open. If there is one knock against Federer, its that he has never won the French, which is played on a clay surface (the other three grand slam events are played on either grass or hard court).
 
Woods, meanwhile, has won all four of his sports major events. Federers not winning the French is akin to Tiger never winning the Open Championship. Of course, Woods has done that three times.
 
You could say that Federer has to deal with clay-court specialists in trying to win the French, guys who were raised and excel on that one surface. You could say that makes it tougher for him to win the French than it does for Tiger to win the British.
 
I wouldnt say that. In golf, certain players play certain courses better than others. There are guys who perform better at Augusta National than they do anywhere else, or guys who are better suited for a U.S. Open layout, or even guys who just love links-style golf.
 
Tiger just happens to be able to win on all of these surfaces. He can adapt his game accordingly, win just about anywhere.
 
And while Federer gets to play the same four venues year in and year out for his major events, Woods doesnt have that opportunity. Each year, aside from the Masters Tournament, he has to compete on different courses than the year before.
 
Imagine if the majors were contested annually as follows: Masters, Augusta National; U.S. Open, Bethpage Black; Open Championship, St. Andrews; PGA Championship, Medinah.
 
Woods might never lose another major ' at least not in medal play.
 
But in match play ... that might be a different story.
 
Without question, if golf was nothing but mano e mano, Woods would still be The Man. But I dont think his record would be as good as it would be ' has been ' in stroke play.
 
This isnt to denigrate what Woods has accomplished and is accomplishing. Its to show that there is someone out there in the world of sports who is not only doing what Tiger is doing ' but someone who is doing it even a little bit better (in my opinion).
 
Overall, in judging these two greats, I give a slight advantage to Federer. Call it: 6-7, 7-6, 6-7, 7-6, 10-8. Or Federer in 38 holes.
 
I think it's tougher for Federer to win a tournament than it is for Woods. And, all things equal and golf being match play, I don't think Tiger would win as often as does Roger.
 
Tiger's record in the WGC-Match Play is 23-5 in seven appearances. That's really good. That's an 82-percent winning rate. But it's not 94 percent. Woods hasn't been nearly as dominant in the format as a professional as he was as an amateur.
 
And don't say that Tiger faces stiffer compeition than does Federer -- not when all we've been doing over the last decade is berating Woods' opponents.
 
In fact, these two are in a similar boat when it comes to comparing their respective levels of competition. Their excellence makes us feel as if they are competing against diluted fields. Theyre single malt scotch; everyone else is a splash of water.
 
Critics love to say that Tiger doesnt have to contend with an Arnold Palmer or Lee Trevino or Tom Watson, like Jack Nicklaus did. By the same token, they say that Federer doesnt have to deal with an in-his-prime Andre Agassi or Jim Courier or Boris Becker, like Pete Sampras did.
 
But whos to say that Woods wouldnt have beaten them all routinely, maybe even Nicklaus. And whos to say that Federer wouldnt have done the same, even to Sampras.
 
Well never know how Tiger would have fared against the legends of the past, just as we will never know the same about Federer.
 
But this we do know: they are far and away better than everyone against whom they are competing in the present. And, in modern individual sports, the only one comparable to one is the other.
 
Email your thoughts to Mercer Baggs
 
Related Links:
  • Full Coverage - Buick Invitational
  • Rahm, Koepka both jump in OWGR after wins

    By Will GrayNovember 20, 2017, 1:19 pm

    Jon Rahm and Brooks Koepka both made moves inside the top 10 of the Official World Golf Ranking following wins in Dubai and Japan, respectively.

    Rahm captured the European Tour season finale, winning the DP World Tour Championship by a shot. It was his third worldwide victory of 2017 and it allowed the Spaniard to overtake Hideki Matsuyama at world No. 4. It also establishes a new career high in the rankings for Rahm, who started the year ranked No. 137.

    Koepka cruised to a nine-shot victory while successfully defending his title at the Japan Tour's Dunlop Phoenix. The victory was his first since winning the U.S. Open and it helped Koepka jump three spots to No. 7 in the latest rankings. Reigning PGA Tour Rookie of the Year Xander Schauffele, who finished second behind Koepka in Japan, went from 30th to 24th.

    After earning his maiden PGA Tour victory at the RSM Classic, Austin Cook vaulted from No. 302 to No. 144 in the world. Runner-up J.J. Spaun jumped 48 spots to No. 116, while a hole-out with his final approach helped Brian Gay rise 73 spots to No. 191 after finishing alone in third at Sea Island.

    Dustin Johnson remains world No. 1, followed by Jordan Spieth and Justin Thomas with Rahm and Matsuyama now rounding out the top five. Justin Rose remains at No. 6, followed by Koepka, Rickie Fowler and Henrik Stenson. Rory McIlroy slid two spots to No. 10 and is now in danger of falling out of the top 10 for the first time since May 2014.

    With his return to competition now less than two weeks away, Tiger Woods fell four more spots to No. 1193 in the latest rankings.

    Love to undergo hip replacement surgery

    By Rex HoggardNovember 20, 2017, 1:08 pm

    ST. SIMONS ISLAND, Ga. – Two days removed from arguably the most hectic week of his year, Davis Love III will undergo replacement surgery on his left hip.

    Love, who hosted and played in last week’s RSM Classic, said he tried to avoid the surgery, but the pain became too much and he will undergo the procedure on Tuesday at the Andrews Sports Medicine and Orthopedic Center in Birmingham, Ala.

    “I had a hip problem the last few years, and I had a hip resurfacing trying to avoid hip surgery because I’m a chicken, but after playing [the CIMB Classic and Sanderson Farms Championship] I realized it was an uphill battle,” Love said.


    RSM Classic: Articles, photos and videos

    Full-field scores from the RSM Classic


    Love said doctors have told him recovery from the procedure will take between three to four months, but he should be able to start work on his chipping and putting within a few weeks.

    Love, who missed the cut at the RSM Classic, said earlier in the week that his goal is to become the oldest PGA Tour winner and that the only way to achieve that was by having the surgery.

    “Now I’m excited that I’ve crossed that bridge,” said Love, who will turn 54 next April. “Once I get over that I can go right back to the Tour. I won after a spine fusion [2015 Wyndham Championship] and now I’d like to win with a new hip. That’s the reason I’m doing it so I can get back to golf and keep up.”

    LPGA awards: Ryu, S.H. Park tie for POY

    By Randall MellNovember 20, 2017, 1:56 am

    NAPLES, Fla. – In the end, the CME Group Tour Championship played out a lot like the entire 2017 season did.

    Parity reigned.

    Nobody dominated the game’s big season-ending awards, though Lexi Thompson and Sung Hyun Park came close.

    Thompson walked away with the CME Globe’s $1 million jackpot and the Vare Trophy for low scoring average. If she had made that last 2-foot putt at the 72nd hole Sunday, she might also have walked away with the Rolex Player of the Year Award and the Rolex world No. 1 ranking.

    Park shared the Rolex Player of the Year Award with So Yeon Ryu. By doing so, Park joined Nancy Lopez as the only players in LPGA history to win the Player of the Year and Rookie of the Year titles in the same season. Lopez did it in 1978. Park also won the LPGA money-winning title.

    Here’s a summary of the big prizes:

    Rolex Player of the Year
    Ryu and Park both ended up with 162 points in the points-based competition. Park started the week five points behind Ryu but made the up the difference with the five points she won for tying for sixth.

    It marks the first time the award has been shared since its inception in 1966.

    Ryu and Park join Inbee Park as the only South Koreans to win the award. Park won it in 2013.


    Vare Trophy
    Thompson won the award with a scoring average of 69.114. Sung Hyun Park finished second at 69.247. Park needed to finish at least nine shots ahead of Thompson at the CME Group Tour Championship to win the trophy.

    There were a record 12 players with scoring averages under 70.0 this year, besting the previous record of five, set last year.


    CME Globe $1 million prize
    Thompson entered the week first in the CME points reset, but it played out as a two-woman race on the final day. Park needed to finish ahead of Thompson in the CME Group Tour Championship to overtake her for the big money haul. Thompson tied for second in the tournament while Park tied for sixth.

    By winning the CME Group Tour Championship, Jutanugarn had a shot at the $1 million, but she needed Park to finish the tournament eighth or worse and Thompson to finish ninth or worse.


    LPGA money-winning title
    Park claimed the title with $2,335,883 in earnings. Ryu was second, with $1,981,593 in earnings.

    The tour saw a tour-record 17 players win $1 million or more this season, two more than did so last year.

    Ryu came into the week as the only player who could pass Park for the title, but Ryu needed to win to do so.


    Rolex world No. 1 ranking
    The top ranking was up for grabs at CME, with No. 1 Feng, No. 2 Sung Hyun Park and No. 3 So Yeon Ryu all within three hundredths of a ranking point. Even No. 4 Lexi Thompson had a chance to grab the top spot if she won, but in the end nobody could overtake Feng. Her reign will extend to a second straight week.


    Rolex Rookie of the Year
    Park ran away with the award with her U.S. Women’s Open and Canadian Pacific Women’s Open victories among her 11 top-10 finishes. She had the award locked up long before she arrived for the season-ending CME Group Tour Championship.

    Ko ends first winless season with T-16 at CME

    By Randall MellNovember 20, 2017, 1:07 am

    NAPLES, Fla. – Lydia Ko carved a hybrid 3-iron to 15 feet and ended the most intensely scrutinized year of her young career with a birdie Sunday at the CME Group Tour Championship.

    “Nice to finish the season on a high note,” Ko said after posting a 3-under-par 69, good for a tie for 16th. “Obviously, not a top-10 finish, but I played really solid. I feel like I finished the season off pretty strong.”

    Ko posted two second-place finishes, a third-place finish and a tie for fifth in her last eight starts.

    “Ever since Indy [in early September], I played really good and put myself in good positions,” Ko said. “I felt like the confidence factor was definitely higher than during the middle of the year. I had some opportunities, looks for wins.”

    Sunday marked the end of Ko’s first winless season since she began playing LPGA events at 15 years old.

    Let the record show, she left with a smile, eager to travel to South Korea to spend the next month with family after playing a charity event in Bradenton, Fla., on Monday.


    CME Group Tour Championship: Articles, photos and videos

    Full-field scores from the CME Group Tour Championship


    Much was made of Ko beginning the year with sweeping changes, with new equipment (PXG), a new coach (Gary Gilchrist) and a new caddie (Peter Godfrey).

    In the final summary, it wasn’t a Ko-like year, not by the crazy high standards she has set.

    She saw her run of 85 consecutive weeks at No. 1 end in June. She arrived in Naples holding on to the No. 8 ranking. She ends the year 13th on the LPGA money list with $1,177,450 in earnings. It’s the first time she hasn’t finished among the top three in money in her four full years on tour. She did log 11 top-10 finishes overall, three second-place finishes.

    How did she evaluate her season?

    “I feel like it was a better year than everyone else thinks, like `Lydia is in a slump,’” Ko said. “I feel like I played solid.

    “It's a season that, obviously, I learned a lot from ... the mental aspect of saying, `Hey, get over the bads and kind of move on.’”

    Ko said she learned a lot watching Stacy Lewis deal with her run of second-place finishes after winning so much.

    “Winning a championship is a huge deal, but, sometimes, it's overrated when you haven't won,” Ko said. “Like, you're still playing well, but just haven't won. I kind of feel like it's been that kind of year.

    “I think everybody has little ups and downs.”