Golf Talk Live - Johnny Bulla Transcript Segment 5

By Golf Channel DigitalFebruary 12, 2001, 5:00 pm
(MUSIC)
 
PETER KESSLER
 
HERE'S A QUESTION, JOHN, I'M GOING TO READ TO YOU THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO OUR WEBSITE. YOU FINISHED SECOND IN TWO OPEN CHAMPIONSHIPS ON THE OLD COURSE AT ST. ANDREWS. WHAT DID YOU THINK OF THE GOLF COURSE? SEAN STEPHENS WOULD LIKE TO KNOW.
 
JOHNNY BULLA
 
WELL, TRADITIONALLY IT'S A GREAT GOLF COURSE BECAUSE IT'S BEEN THERE SO LONG. THE HISTORY AND EVERYTHING BUT AS FAR AS A REAL TEST OF GOLF, THAT WE KNOW IT OVER HERE, IT COMES UP LACKING. I, I NEVER WAS TOO IMPRESSED WITH ST. ANDREWS BUT I'LL TELL YOU A STORY. THE FIRST TIME I WENT OVER THERE, IN '39, I'D LED THE OPEN AFTER THREE ROUNDS AND I WAS
 
PLAYING REAL WELL AND IT WAS CALM AND I WENT OUT AND PLAYED AND I SHOT 68 AND DIDN'T PLAY PARTICULARLY GOOD. I SAID I CAN'T UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE CAN'T SHOOT THIS THING IN NOTHING. I SAID I'LL BREAK 70 EVERY TIME I PLAY IT. THE NEXT DAY THE WIND
 
WAS BLOWING AND THE RAIN WAS COMING SIDEWAYS. IF I HADN'T HAVE PICKED IT UP I WOULDN'T HAVE BROKEN 90. SO AS FAR AS THE CONDITIONS IS WHAT MAKES ST. ANDREWS. IF THERE'S NO CONDITIONS THERE, LIKE TIGER
 
CAUGHT IT, THEN IT'S NOT, IT'S A PUSSYCAT.
 
PETER KESSLER
 
WHAT DID SAM THINK ABOUT IT OTHER THAN WHEN HE FIRST SAW IT BY TRAIN HE SAID LOOK THERE'S A BROKEN DOWN OLD GOLF COURSE.
 
JOHNNY BULLA
 
HE, HE THOUGHT IT WAS THE WORST THING HE'D EVER PLAYED UNTIL HE WON THE TOURNAMENT AND THEN HE KEPT HIS MOUTH SHUT.
 
PETER KESSLER
 
(LAUGHS)
 
HE DIDN'T EVEN LIKE IT THEN?
 
JOHNNY BULLA
 
NO.
 
PETER KESSLER
 
ALRIGHT, NOW, IN THE LATE 30'S WHEN BING CROSBY HAD HIS TOURNAMENT FOR THE FIRST TIME 36 HOLES DOWN AT RANCHO SANTA FE BEFORE THEY MOVED UP TO MONTEREY, SAM OF COURSE WANTED TO BE PAID IN CASH. I THINK HE WAS. DO PEOPLE APPRECIATE, DO YOU
 
THINK THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF BING CROSBY AND BOB HOPE IN TERMS OF WHAT THEY'VE MEANT TO GOLF AND WHAT THEY'VE MEANT TO TOURNAMENT GOLF?
 
JOHNNY BULLA
 
OH, THEY WERE THE BILLBOARDS FOR GOLF. THEY, THEY'VE NEVER BEEN RECOGNIZED AS MUCH AS THEY, THEY SHOULD HAVE BECAUSE THEY BOTH PROMOTED GOLF IN A BIG WAY. BING AND, BING AND BOB DID SO MUCH FOR THE PEOPLE GETTING THEIR CONSCIOUSNESS
 
OF GOLF BECAUSE THEY'RE ENTERTAINERS AND THEY KNEW THEM. I DON'T THINK YOU CAN GIVE THEM TOO MUCH CREDIT FOR IT.
 
PETER KESSLER
 
TEL US A LITTLE BIT ABOUT HOGAN AS A PUTTER IN THE 30'S BEFORE HE WON, IN THE 40'S WHEN HE WAS WINNING, AND AFTER THE ACCIDENT, SAY IN THE EARLY 50'S.
 
JOHNNY BULLA
 
WELL HOGAN WAS A CONSERVATIVE PUTTER. FROM TEN FEET IN HE'S AS GOOD AS ANYBODY, BUT YOU NEVER SAW HIM MAKE MANY LONG PUTTS BECAUSE HE WAS ALWAYS CONSERVATIVE. HE'S WANTING TO GET IT AROUND THE GREENS.
 
YOU DIDN'T SEE HOGAN THREE PUTT VERY MANY BECAUSE HIS, HIS IDEA WAS TO GET IT CLOSE TO THE HOLE. IT FELL IN FINE, BUT HE WAS A GREAT PUTTER.
 
PETER KESSLER
 
DID YOU THINK IT WAS SOMEBODY WITH A GOOD SHORT GAME GENERALLY AS DISTINCT FROM BEING A GREAT PUTTER FROM TEN FEET AND IN?
 
JOHNNY BULLA
 
OH SURE YOU DO. SURE YOU DO. TODAY, THE, MOST OF THE BOYS THAT STAY OUT THERE THAT WIN, THEY'RE GOOD FROM EVERY PLACE.
 
PETER KESSLER
 
TELL US A LITTLE BIT ABOUT JIMMY DEMARRET. HE, HE WON THE MASTERS THREE TIMES IN '40, IN '47 AND '50 AND THOSE WERE HIS THREE MAJORS. YOU KNOW WE HEAR THAT HE WAS AN INCREDIBLE HANDS PLAYER, AN INCREDIBLE SHOT MAKER. YOU TELL US.
 
JOHNNY BULLA
 
WELL, JIMMY WAS ONE OF THE GREATEST ASSETS TO GOLF BECAUSE HE WAS A GREAT DRESSER, HE HAD A GREAT PERSONALITY, HE HAD GREAT WIT AND HE WAS REALLY A GREAT PLAYER. JIMMY WAS HIS OWN WORST ENEMY. HE LIKED
 
TO HAVE FUN. HE WAS ONE OF THESE FREE SPIRITED GUYS AND HE DIDN'T TAKE IT SERIOUSLY LIKE A LOT OF THE OTHERS, BUT HE HAD SHOTS THAT, THAT NOBODY PLAYED ANY BETTER THAN HE DID, AND
 
IT'S JUST TOO BAD THAT JIMMY WAS HIS OWN WORST ENEMY BECAUSE HE REALLY HAD THE TALENT. EVERYBODY, AND HE LOVED THEM, EVERYBODY LOVED HIM. I REMEMBER WHEN I WON THE L.A. OPEN, EVERYBODY WAS COMPLAINING THIS,
 
THAT I WON IT AND JIMMY SAYS ' I'M TICKLED TO DEATH HE WON IT. HE DESERVED IT'. I MEAN HE WAS THAT KIND OF A GUY.
 
PETER KESSLER
 
WHEN PEOPLE REFER TO HIM AS A HANDS PLAYER, DO YOU THINK IT'S ACCURATE?
 
JOHNNY BULLA
 
NO, NO ABSOLUTELY NOT. SURE HE HAD GREAT BIG HANDS. FOREARMS LIKE POPEYE, BUT HE, AND HE MANIPULATED THE BALL GOOD BUT HE HAD GREAT BODY ACTION. HE STOOD PRETTY CLOSE TO IT, FEET FAIRLY CLOSE TOGETHER BUT HE HAD GREAT BODY ACTION INTO THE BALL.
 
PETER KESSLER
 
WHY DID HE AND HOGAN GET ALONG AS WELL AS THEY DID.
 
JOHNNY BULLA
 
I'LL TELL YOU EXACTLY. JUST LIKE SNEAD AND MYSELF. WE'RE OPPOSITE. HOGAN WAS A QUIET LAID BACK SORT OF GUY. HE WAS A FREE SPIRIT. HE, YOU SEE THESE ALL THE TIMES WHERE THE OPPOSITE ATTRACT EACH OTHER. I'M, AS OPPOSITE FROM SNEAD AS YOU CAN BE BUT WE ALWAYS GOT ALONG GREAT AND HOGAN
 
AND WELL THE SAME WAY WITH, WITH JACK BURKE, AND, AND DEMARRET. JACK WAS A LAID BACK SERIOUS SORT OF A GUY AND JIMMY WAS A FREE SPIRIT AND IT MADE GREAT COMPATIBILITY.
 
PETER KESSLER
 
IS IT TRUE, HERE'S ANOTHER ONE OF THOSE, IS IT A TRUE STORY THAT YOU AND JACK BURKE WERE DRIVING ACROSS THE COUNTRY TO GO PLAY IN SOME TOURNAMENT AND YOU STOPPED FOR LUNCH AND THAT YOU WENT TO GO WASH
 
YOUR HAND SAND HE FORGOT TO WAIT FOR YOU TO COME OUT AND
 
JOHNNY BULLA
 
NO
 
PETER KESSLER
 
THAT'S NOT TRUE EITHER
 
JOHNNY BULLA
 
NO. NONE OF THOSE STORIES ARE TRUE.
 
PETER KESSLER
 
(LAUGHING)
 
WHY DID YOU AND SAM, WHAT, WHAT WAS THE THINGS THAT MADE YOU AND SAM SO OPPOSITE THAT HELPED YOU GET ALONG SO WELL?
 
JOHNNY BULLA
 
WELL, OF COURSE I WAS A GREAT ADMIRER OF HIS GOLF. I APPRECIATED HIS SKILLS, AND SAM WAS A TRUE FRIEND AS FAR AS A FRIEND IS CONCERNED. LET ME, LET ME TELL YOU A STORY, WE WERE GOING TO PLAY IN THE CHICAGO OPEN,
 
I TELL YOU THIS IS PROOF OF WHAT FRIENDSHIP WE HAD. WE WERE GOING TO PLAY IN THE CHICAGO OPEN AND L.B. ISLY, THE PRESIDENT OF WILSON CALLED ME, SAM WAS STANDING WITH ME, HE SAYS SAM, WOULD YOU BRING S... WOULD YOU
 
BRING JOHN, WOULD YOU BRING SAM OVER, I WANT TO TALK TO HIM AND I SAT OUTSIDE HIS OFFICE WAITING FOR SAM TO COME OUT AND SAM CAME OUT AND HIS FACE WAS RED AND I KNEW HE WAS MAD. HE SAYS LET'S GET OUT OF HERE, AND I THOUGHT HE'S GOT FIRED AND HE HAD THE BEST CONTRACT IN GOLF. WE GOT IN THE CAR AND HE SAYS YOU KNOW WHAT
 
HE WANTED? HE TOLD ME THAT HE DIDN'T WANT ME TRAVELING WITH YOU ANYMORE BECAUSE YOU WERE BAD FOR GOLF, AND I SAID MR. ISLY, YOU CAN TELL ME WHAT CLUBS TO PLAY, YOU CAN TELL ME WHAT GOLF COURSES TO GO TO, BUT DON'T EVER TELL ME ABOUT MY FRIENDS
 
BECAUSE JOHN AND I ARE CLOSE AND WE'RE GOING TO STAY THAT WAY. NOW HE COULD HAVE BLOWN HIS WHOLE CONTRACT AS MUCH AS HE LOVED MONEY. I'VE, MY FRIENDSHIP MEANT MORE TO HIM, AND THAT MEANT A LOT TO ME BECAUSE HE WAS REALLY A TRULY FRIEND.
 
PETER KESSLER
 
SO NOW WHY WOULD ISLY SAY SOMETHING LIKE THAT? WAS HE UPSET BECAUSE YOU WERE THE GUY WHO PROMOTED A GOLF BALL THAT YOU COULD BUY IN A DRUGSTORE?
 
JOHNNY BULLA
 
ABSOLUTELY. THEY WOULD COME OUT WITH A HOLE HIGH AND IT WASN'T WORTH A NICKEL AND WE JUST KILLED THEM IN, IN SALES, SO ISLY WAS WANTING ME TO GET OUT OF THE PICTURE. HE DIDN'T HAVE ANYTHING PERSONALLY
 
AGAINST ME, IT WAS ALL A MARKETING THING.
 
PETER KESSLER
 
AS WE LEAVE FOR JUST A MOMENT I WANT TO MAKE SURE EVERYBODY'S FAMILIAR WITH OUR WEBSITE. LOG ON TO THEGOLFCHANNEL.COM. YOU CAN CLICK ON TO THE GOLF TALK LIVE SECTION. IT'S A PLACE WHERE YOU CAN LISTEN TO THE
 
SHOW ON DEMAND, A PLACE WHERE YOU CAN SUBMIT A QUESTION FOR A GUEST WHO WILL BE ON THE SHOW AND IT'S ALSO A PLACE WHERE YOU CAN PULL UP AT YOUR LEISURE, A GOLF TALK LIVE TRANSCRIPT. WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK WITH JOHNNY BULLA.
 
(MUSIC)
 
NEXT SEGMENT
Getty Images

V-i-n-d-i-c-a-t-i-o-n: Repeat gives Koepka credit he deserves

By Ryan LavnerJune 18, 2018, 2:08 am

SOUTHAMPTON, N.Y. – In an ironic twist Sunday, the last man to win consecutive U.S. Opens was tasked with chronicling Brooks Koepka’s final round at Shinnecock Hills.

Carrying a microphone for Fox Sports, Curtis Strange kept his composure as the on-course reporter. He didn’t cough in Koepka’s downswing. Didn’t step on his ball in the fescue. Didn’t talk too loudly while Koepka lined up a putt.

Instead, Strange stood off to the side, clipboard covering his mouth, and watched in awe as Koepka stamped himself as the best U.S. Open player of this next generation.

And so after Koepka became the first player in 29 years to take consecutive Opens, Strange found himself fourth in the greeting line near the 18th green. He was behind Koepka’s playing competitor, Dustin Johnson. And he was behind Koepka’s father, Bob. And he was behind Koepka’s caddie, Ricky Elliott.

But there Strange was, standing on a sandy path leading to the clubhouse, ready to formally welcome Koepka into one of the most exclusive clubs in golf.

“Hell of a job, bud,” Strange barked in his ear, above the din. “Incredible.”

That Koepka prevailed on two wildly different layouts, and in totally different conditions, was even more satisfying.

Erin Hills, in Middle of Nowhere, Wis., was unlike any U.S. Open venue in recent memory. The wide-open fairways were lined with thick, deep fescue, but heavy rain early in the week and the absence of any significant wind turned golf’s toughest test into the Greater Milwaukee Open. Koepka bashed his way to a record-tying score (16 under par) and over the past year has never felt fully appreciated, in large part because of the weirdness of the USGA setup.   


U.S. Open: Scores | Live blog | Full coverage


Koepka doesn’t concern himself with that type of noise, of course, but when he arrived at Shinnecock earlier this week he felt a sense of familiarity. The generous fairways. The punishing venue. The premium on iron play.

“It’s a similar feel,” Elliott said. “We said it all week.”

A new, quirky venue like Erin Hills might not have been held in high regard, but the rich history of Shinnecock? It demanded respect.

“He’s some player,” Strange said, “and I’m proud of him because there was some talk last year of Erin Hills not being the Open that is supposed to be an Open. But he won on a classic, so he’s an Open player.”

“This one is a lot sweeter,” Koepka said.

Those around the 28-year-old were shocked that he even had a chance to defend his title.

Last fall Koepka began feeling discomfort in his left wrist. He finished last in consecutive tournaments around the holidays, then underwent an MRI that showed he had a torn ligament in his left wrist.

Koepka takes immense pride in having a life outside of golf – he never watches Tour coverage on off-weeks – but he was downright miserable during his indefinite stint on the sidelines. He said it was the lowest point of his career, as he sat in a soft cast up to his elbow, binge-watching TV shows and gaining 15 pounds. The only players he heard from during his hiatus: Johnson, Phil Mickelson and Bubba Watson.

“You just feel like you get forgotten,” Koepka said.

During the spring, Elliott would occasionally drive from Orlando to Jupiter, Fla., to check on his boss. “He was down in the dumps,” he said. “That sort of injury he had, it didn’t seem like there was going to be an end. There was no timeframe on it, and that was the most frustrating thing.”

After the Masters, Koepka told Elliott that his wrist was feeling better and that he was going to start hitting balls. Elliott brought his clubs to South Florida, and they played a few holes at The Floridian.

“He was hitting it right on the button,” Elliott said. “I said, ‘Are you sure you haven’t been practicing?’ He hadn’t missed a beat. I have no idea how he does it. He’s just a tremendously talented guy.”

In limited action before the Open, Koepka fired a trio of 63s, at TPC Sawgrass and Colonial. He’s never been short on confidence – as a 12-year-old he once told his dad that he was going to drop out of school in four years and turn pro – and he recently woofed to swing coach Claude Harmon III that he was primed to win sometime in May or June.

“I said to him on the range this morning, ‘You were on your couch in January and February, not really knowing if you were going to be able to play here,’” Harmon said. “I think that’s why it means so much to him. That’s one of the reasons that he kept saying no one was more confident than him, because to get this opportunity to come back and play and have a chance to win back-to-back U.S. Opens, he was going to take advantage of it as best he could.”

Koepka carded a second-round 66 to put himself in the mix, then survived a hellacious third-round setup to join a four-way tie for the lead, along with Johnson, the world No. 1 and his fellow Bash Brother.

As much as Johnson is praised for his resilience, Koepka has proven to be equally tough in crunch time, especially in this major. There’s no better stage for Koepka to showcase his immense gifts than the Open, an examination that tests players physically, mentally and even spiritually. But Koepka, like Johnson, never joined the growing chorus of complainers at Shinnecock. The closest he came to criticizing the setup was this: “I think the course is very close.”

Rather than whine, he said that he relished the challenge of firing away from flags. He accepted bad shots. He tried to eliminate double bogeys. Even after his wrist injury, Koepka showed no hesitation gouging out of the deep fescue, his ferocious clubhead speed allowing him to escape the rough and chase approach shots near the green, where he could rely on his sneaky-good short game.

“He has the perfect game to play in majors,” Harmon said. “He probably plays more conservatively in majors. We’re always joking that we wish he would play the way he does in majors every week. I just think he knows how important pars and bogeys are. It says a lot about him as a player.”

Johnson has many of the same physical and mental attributes, and they’ve each benefited from the other’s intense focus and discipline. They both adhere to a strict diet and are frequent workout partners, which even included a gym session on Sunday morning, before their penultimate pairing. They made small talk, chatting about lifting and how many of the Sunday pins were located in the middle of the green, but after they arrived at the course they barely said two words to each other.

“They’re good friends on and off the course,” Harmon said, “but they definitely want to kick the s--- out of each other.”

“That’s the way it’s supposed to be,” Strange said. “If they’re best buddies, well, you’re standing between me and the trophy. You don’t care much for him for 4 1/2 hours.”

There was much at stake Sunday, but none more significant than Koepka’s march on history. Squaring off head-to-head against the game’s best player, Koepka outplayed Johnson from the outset, going 3 under for the first 10 holes to open up a two-shot lead. And unlike at Erin Hills, where he pulled away late with birdies, it was his par (and bogey) saves that kept Koepka afloat on Nos. 11, 12 and 14.  

In the end, he clipped Fleetwood (who shot a record-tying 63) by one and Johnson by two.

“You’ve got to give him a lot of credit,” Strange said, shaking his head. “He’s got a lot of guts.”

As Koepka marched away to sign his card, Strange was asked if it was bittersweet to know that he’s no longer the answer to the trivia question, the last guy to go back-to-back at the Open.

“Heck no!” he said. “What are they going to do, take one away? I’m a part of a group. And it’s a good group. I hope it means as much to him as it has to me.”

Getty Images

This time, Dad gets to enjoy Koepka's Father's Day win

By Rex HoggardJune 18, 2018, 1:39 am

SOUTHAMPTON, N.Y. – When Brooks Koepka won his first U.S. Open last year at Erin Hills the celebration was relatively subdued.

His family didn’t attend the ’17 championship, but there was no way they were missing this year’s U.S. Open.

“This year we booked something about five miles away [from Shinnecock Hills]," said Koepka’s father, Bob. "We weren’t going to miss it and I’m so glad we’re here.”

The family was treated to a show, with Koepka closing with a 68 for a one-stroke victory to become the first player since Curtis Strange in 1989 to win back-to-back U.S. Opens.


U.S. Open: Scores | Live blog | Full coverage


Koepka called his father early Sunday to wish him a happy Father’s Day, and Bob Koepka said he noticed a similar confidence in his son’s voice to the way he sounded when they spoke on Sunday of last year’s championship.

There was also one other similarity.

“Two years in a row, I haven't gotten him anything [for Father’s Day],” Brooks Koepka laughed. “Next year, I'm not going to get him anything either. It might bring some good luck.

“It's incredible to have my family here, and my dad loves golf. To be here, he loves watching. To share it with him this time, it will be a little bit sweeter.”

Getty Images

Sunday drama won't overshadow USGA's issues

By Randall MellJune 18, 2018, 1:30 am

SOUTHAMPTON, N.Y. – It looked like a British Open.

It was playing like a U.S. Open.

Through two rounds, Shinnecock Hills was double trouble in the best kind of way.

It was a hybrid in the most appealing sense of golf course architecture’s ancient allure and its modern defenses.

Halfway through, the USGA was nailing the setup, with Dustin Johnson the only player under par in one of the toughest but fairest tests in recent U.S. Open memory.

This looked like it was going to be remembered as USGA CEO Mike Davis’ masterpiece, but even a Sunday to remember couldn’t trump a Saturday to forget.

Sunday’s drama - with the history Brooks Koepka made becoming the first player in three decades to win back-to-back U.S. Opens, with Tommy Fleetwood’s 63 equaling Johnny Miller’s final round record - could not restore faith being lost in the USGA’s ability to set up and manage this championship.

This U.S. Open ended with footnotes the size of headlines.

The issues arising Saturday with the USGA losing control of the course raised even more troubling questions about why this organization’s heavy hand can’t seem to avoid becoming as much a part of the story as the competition.


U.S. Open: Scores | Live blog | Full coverage


The controversy that was ignited Saturday when Phil Mickelson intentionally incurred a two-shot penalty by making a putting stroke on a moving ball also raised questions about the organization’s ability to fairly administer its own rules.

It’s a shame, because Davis has some good ideas.

His reimagined vision of this championship as the “ultimate test” makes sense as a better and more complete event. His ideas are designed to identify the game’s most complete player on America’s best courses better than any other major.

It’s just not working.

This year’s failure in the wake of the ’04 debacle at Shinnecock Hills is especially worrisome. Davis vowed it wouldn’t happen again. Somehow, some way, he let it happen again.

Maybe the old standards we’ve come to judge the U.S. Open upon are too high, impossible to meet with today’s more athletic player, high-tech coaching and space-age drivers, shafts and balls.

Nobody ever protected par better than the USGA, but maybe par can’t be properly protected anymore, without tricking up a course.

Because if USGA officials can’t make its exacting formula work at an architectural treasure like Shinnecock Hills, where they had it absolutely perfect for two days, you wonder if they can make it work at all.

The testament to how the USGA was nailing its formula wasn’t in what we heard the first two days. It was in what we weren’t hearing. Only one player was under par through Friday, but there wasn’t a complaint to be heard in the locker room or on the range.

They were wiping the smiles off players’ faces without infuriating them.

In that regard, the USGA was delivering a miracle.

The wonderful appeal Shinnecock Hills held as a U.S. Open/British Open hybrid at week’s start ended up being twisted into something else by week’s end. It stood as a symbol of the championship’s confusion over its proper identity.

Even with Sunday’s compelling storylines unfolding, players were still frustrated over setup.

Saturday was over the edge, with Davis admitting “there were parts of this, simply put, that were too tough.” He said winds were stronger than expected, but the winds weren’t that much different than were forecast.

So USGA officials softened the course for Sunday, with more overnight watering and more friendly hole locations.

That turned Shinnecock Hills into Jekyl and Hyde on the weekend.

Scoring told the story.

Rickie Fowler shot 84 on Saturday and 65 on Sunday. Fleetwood shot 78 and 63.

They weren’t alone, even though the weather wasn’t as dramatically different as the scores would indicate.

This wasn’t about the weather. It was about the course being manipulated in ways that frustrated players.

“They soaked the hell out of it,” Pat Perez said after tying for 36th. “They’ve got all the pins in the middle.

“It is supposed to gradually get to where it was Saturday afternoon. You don’t lose it on Saturday and then try to make up for it, soak the course and make it totally different.”

Brandt Snedeker was equally befuddled playing drastically different conditions in weather that wasn’t so drastically different.

“The thing that is unfortunate is that the guys that were playing the best golf this week took the brunt of it yesterday, when it should have been vice versa,” Snedeker said. “Some guys got robbed of a really good chance to win a golf tournament yesterday afternoon, which is not fair.”

There were other issues that continued to challenge faith in the USGA.

Despite later acknowledging it set up the course too tough in spots on Saturday, the USGA put players on the clock for slow play.

The Mickelson penalty also raised issues.

He got a two-shot penalty under Rule 14-5 (playing moving ball) when there was some outcry over whether he should have been penalized under Rule 1-2 (exerting influence), which would have opened the door to disqualification for a serious breach. The USGA rigorously defended 14-5 (playing moving ball) as the proper call.

John Daly wasn’t disqualified for striking a moving ball in a similar instance at the U.S. Open at Pinehurst in 1999. He also got a two-shot penalty, but there was a difference in the situations that might have justified Mickelson’s disqualification.

Daly said he intentionally hit a moving ball out of frustration, as protest over the USGA’s unfair hole locations.

Mickelson said he intentionally hit a moving ball on the 13th green Saturday at Shinnecock Hills to try prevent his ball from rolling off the green. He said he knew the rules and was intentionally breaking them to gain an advantage. He compared it to using the rules to get a better lie with a drop, but there’s a difference between using the rules to your advantage and breaking them to gain an advantage.

The difference in those motivations, as Golf Channel’s Brandel Chamblee pointed out, opened the interpretation of the violation as a serious breach worthy of disqualification.

The question of whether Mickelson’s manipulation of the rules was serious enough to invoke disqualification as a breach of etiquette under Rule 33-7 was dismissed by the USGA as inappropriate.

It should be noted that the USGA and R&A should be applauded for its monumental overhaul of the Rules of Golf, a rules modernization going into effect next year. It’s a welcomed simplification of the rules that required an exhaustive review.

This week’s complications show the unrelenting challenges they continue to tackle.

We leave this U.S. Open with history being made, with Koepka joining Ben Hogan and Curtis Strange as just the third players since World War II to win the title in back-to-back years.

We also leave hoping the USGA can deliver four days of next year’s U.S. Open at Pebble Beach as free of controversy as it delivered the first two days at Shinnecock Hills, because this year’s championship felt half baked.

Will Gray contributed to this report.

Getty Images

Brandel rips USGA: 'There's no obvious leadership'

By Golf Channel DigitalJune 18, 2018, 1:29 am

The 2018 U.S. Open will certainly be remembered for Brooks Koepka's successful title defense.

But there's no doubt that it will also be remembered for Phil Mickelson's decision to hit a moving golf ball on Saturday, for the USGA's decision not to disqualify him, and for the governing body once again losing control of Shinnecock Hills over the weekend.

Speaking on "Live From the U.S. Open" on Sunday night, analyst Brandel Chamblee took the USGA and its leadership to task for more than just the inconsistent playing conditions this week.

His comments - edited and condensed for clarity - appear below:

"Something was amiss in a big, big way [at Shinnecock Hills]. I think the USGA has lost a lot of the trust of the golf world. They've done it for numerous reasons.

"On their watch, they missed COR – the rebound effect in drivers. They missed the rebound effect and the combination of the rebound effect [with] the ball. They missed it, on their watch. And now, the feeling is that they’re crying foul, even though it was on their watch. And so, essentially, the equipment companies got it done, by [the USGA’s] standards, legally.

"On their watch, there have been huge mistakes in major championships. … We well know this one (Shinnecock in 2018) – a colossal mistake all the way across the board. The golf course was bumpy the first day; they didn’t quite get that right. It was awful the third day. And today, in a different kind of way, it was far too easy.

"And then there’s penalties that they levy that make absolutely no sense, penalties that they don’t levy – not disqualifying Phil Mickelson yesterday. …

"There seems to be no obvious leadership, you know, to me. No obvious leadership heading in the right direction."