Tiger Great Federer a Bit Better

By Mercer BaggsJanuary 29, 2007, 5:00 pm
Tiger Woods is without peer. Thats the popular notion. But there is one active player who might not only be Tigers equal, but perhaps his superior.
He just happens to play another sport.
Roger Federer is to tennis what Woods is to golf: a man so dominant that he is not only the best of his generation, but may one day be considered the greatest of all time.
Tiger Woods
Tiger Woods watches Roger Federer win last year's U.S. Open. (WireImage)
Federer is as currently incomparable in his sport as Tiger is in his. But who between the two is better? Whose accomplishments are more impressive?
Obviously, both men can state a mighty strong case. The numbers for each man border on absurd.
Woods has 55 wins on his primary tour and 12 major championship victories. Federer, who turned pro two years after Woods, has 46 singles victories and 10 grand slam titles.
Both men are currently No. 1 in their respective sports by massive margins. Woods holds golfs record for most consecutive weeks on top; Federer is guaranteed to race past Jimmy Connors mark in just a few weeks.
Tiger won this past week's Buick Invitational to extend his PGA TOUR winning streak to a personal best seven. Roger won this past week's Australian Open to run his match winning streak to a personal best 36.
I could sit here and recite each mans accomplishments until I grew a ZZ Top beard. But I'll give way to time and brevity and say simply: Tiger and Roger are above and beyond everyone else ' except each other.
Woods first met Federer (theyre both IMG clients) last year when the latter won the U.S. Open. And, in the It Takes One to Know One department, the two sporting icons developed a friendship.
Its not a buddy-buddy, call-you-on-the-weekend kind of relationship. Its one based on mutual respect, and even a bit of awe.
So, whos better in his respective sport, the more dominant figure? Thats purely subjective, and you can't really go wrong either way. The humble Federer, who is almost six years younger, would probably say Woods. And when Tiger was voted 2006 AP Male Athlete of the Year he responded by saying: 'What (Federers) done in tennis, I think, is far greater than what I've done in golf. He's lost what ... five matches in three years? That's pretty good.'
My subjective viewpoint: Federer gets a slight nod.
I give the advantage to Federer primarily because tennis is a match-play sport. You have to beat an individual head-to-head in every match in order to win.
Many will argue that it is more difficult to beat a field of 156 to win a tournament instead of just beating seven or so players on your way to a title. But I disagree.
This would be the case if you were just talking about playing one round. But when you spread an event out over the course of 72 holes, you don't have to be the best every day, just the best over four days.
In tennis, however, you have to be the better man each day -- better than the man on the opposite side of the net.
Of course, Federer, like Woods, doesnt always have to be at his best in order to win. He has the talent to give a sub-par performance and still stomp -- or intimidate -- the jelly out of his opponent.
But what if golf was match play all the time? What if every tournament was like the WGC-Match Play Championship? Would Tiger win as much as he does in stroke-play events?
I dont think so.
Woods has won the WGC-Match Play twice. And if every event was contested under a match-play format, he would still win more than anyone else on the PGA TOUR. But I dont think he would be as dominant as he is in stroke play.
To make things a little more equivalent, since the men play a best 3-out-of-5 sets in grand slam events, golf majors could be 36 holes of match play each day. That would certainly benefit Tiger, in relation to fitness and the fact that the better player usually prevails over a longer contest.
But, all in all, I think its easier for Woods to win over the course of four medal-play rounds than it is for him to win by beating a single opponent head-to-head each day.
The underdog always has a greater chance of winning in the short run.
Most sports fans know who Roger Federer is, but not too many ' at least in the U.S. ' know how great he truly is. And if you're not overly familiar with him, take a look at his bio page on wikipedia.org. Raymond Babbitt couldn't calculate those numbers.
Roger Federer
Roger Federer is four behind Pete Sampras on the all-time grand slam wins list. (WireImage)
Federer isn't truly appreciated by many in the States for a few reasons. First of all, he's not American, and, as Englishman Luke Donald accurately pointed out a few years ago, Americans are 'quite insular.'
Two, tennis has lost a lot of popularity over here, as there are no great U.S. champions at the moment. And, unless we're the best at something, then the sport doesn't really matter.
Thirdly, Federer just happens to be a decent person. Swiss-born, hes relatively quite and demur, not one to boast or throw tantrums. In America, all too often, we only seem to care about the sound and the fury of an athlete, not their significance.
Federer, on the other hand, is more interested in adding to his trophy case than increasing his Q rating. And, because of that, he only makes headlines when he wins ' particularly when he wins a grand slam event, because thats the only time many people ever pay attention to mens tennis.
And win he does ' a lot.
Federer was once quoted as saying: I can cope with losing much easier than I used to. I used to cry very much and be very disappointed.
Defeat is easy to handle when it's seldom experienced.
Since the start of 2004, Federers official record is 254-17. Thats a 94.4 percent winning percentage. Hes also won nine of 13 grand slam titles during this stretch. Last year, he went 92-5, with four of those losses coming to one opponent, Rafael Nadal.
One of those Nadal defeats came in the finals of the French Open. If there is one knock against Federer, its that he has never won the French, which is played on a clay surface (the other three grand slam events are played on either grass or hard court).
Woods, meanwhile, has won all four of his sports major events. Federers not winning the French is akin to Tiger never winning the Open Championship. Of course, Woods has done that three times.
You could say that Federer has to deal with clay-court specialists in trying to win the French, guys who were raised and excel on that one surface. You could say that makes it tougher for him to win the French than it does for Tiger to win the British.
I wouldnt say that. In golf, certain players play certain courses better than others. There are guys who perform better at Augusta National than they do anywhere else, or guys who are better suited for a U.S. Open layout, or even guys who just love links-style golf.
Tiger just happens to be able to win on all of these surfaces. He can adapt his game accordingly, win just about anywhere.
And while Federer gets to play the same four venues year in and year out for his major events, Woods doesnt have that opportunity. Each year, aside from the Masters Tournament, he has to compete on different courses than the year before.
Imagine if the majors were contested annually as follows: Masters, Augusta National; U.S. Open, Bethpage Black; Open Championship, St. Andrews; PGA Championship, Medinah.
Woods might never lose another major ' at least not in medal play.
But in match play ... that might be a different story.
Without question, if golf was nothing but mano e mano, Woods would still be The Man. But I dont think his record would be as good as it would be ' has been ' in stroke play.
This isnt to denigrate what Woods has accomplished and is accomplishing. Its to show that there is someone out there in the world of sports who is not only doing what Tiger is doing ' but someone who is doing it even a little bit better (in my opinion).
Overall, in judging these two greats, I give a slight advantage to Federer. Call it: 6-7, 7-6, 6-7, 7-6, 10-8. Or Federer in 38 holes.
I think it's tougher for Federer to win a tournament than it is for Woods. And, all things equal and golf being match play, I don't think Tiger would win as often as does Roger.
Tiger's record in the WGC-Match Play is 23-5 in seven appearances. That's really good. That's an 82-percent winning rate. But it's not 94 percent. Woods hasn't been nearly as dominant in the format as a professional as he was as an amateur.
And don't say that Tiger faces stiffer compeition than does Federer -- not when all we've been doing over the last decade is berating Woods' opponents.
In fact, these two are in a similar boat when it comes to comparing their respective levels of competition. Their excellence makes us feel as if they are competing against diluted fields. Theyre single malt scotch; everyone else is a splash of water.
Critics love to say that Tiger doesnt have to contend with an Arnold Palmer or Lee Trevino or Tom Watson, like Jack Nicklaus did. By the same token, they say that Federer doesnt have to deal with an in-his-prime Andre Agassi or Jim Courier or Boris Becker, like Pete Sampras did.
But whos to say that Woods wouldnt have beaten them all routinely, maybe even Nicklaus. And whos to say that Federer wouldnt have done the same, even to Sampras.
Well never know how Tiger would have fared against the legends of the past, just as we will never know the same about Federer.
But this we do know: they are far and away better than everyone against whom they are competing in the present. And, in modern individual sports, the only one comparable to one is the other.
Email your thoughts to Mercer Baggs
Related Links:
  • Full Coverage - Buick Invitational
  • Getty Images

    Watch: Na punctuates caddie tiff with hole-out

    Microphones captured a fascinating and testy exchange between Kevin Na and his caddie, Kenny Harms, on Na's final hole, No. 9.

    Na was in the right rough, 185 yards from the green, which was guarded by water. He vacillated between a hybrid and an iron, but with either club he would have to hit "a 40-yard cut," as Harms termed it.

    "Over the green's dead," Harms warned.

    "It's not gonna go over the green, Kenny," Na replied.

    Na finally settled on an iron and said to Harms, "As long as you're OK with this club."

    "I'm not," harms replied. "I'm not OK with either one of them."

    "I'm going with this," Na ended the discussion.

    He missed the green with his approach shot, but avoided the water. After taking a free drop away from some TV cables, he had 92 feet 3 inches to the cup and of course, holed the pitch shot for a birdie-3, a 62 and a one-shot lead at the end of the first round.

    Getty Images

    Na (62) leads Hoffman by one at Colonial

    By Nick MentaMay 24, 2018, 10:38 pm

    Kevin Na leads the Fort Worth Invitational by one over Charley Hoffman following a first-round 8-under 62. Here's where things stand through 18 holes at Colonial.

    Leaderboard: Na (-8), Hoffman (-7), Emiliano Grillo (-6), Jhonattan Vegas (-6), Andrew Putnam (-6), Beau Hossler (-6)

    What it means: The veteran Na is in search of just his second PGA Tour victory in 367 events played. The 34-year-old's lone victory came at the 2011 Shriners to go along with nine runner-ups, the most recent of which was a tie for second at this year's Genesis Open. Na missed three straight cuts in April but has rallied back with a weekend stay at The Players and a T-6 at last week's Byron Nelson. Ranked 75th in the world, he is not currently qualified for the U.S. Open or the Open Championship. 

    Round of the day: Na turned in a clean card Thursday with six birdies and an eagle at the par-5 first, his 10th hole of the day. He closed with a chip-in birdie at No. 9 following a friendly disagreement with his caddie (more on that below). 

    Best of the rest: Hoffman was likewise bogey-free, drawing seven circles. The four-time Tour winner and typically steady performer has yet to register a top-10 finish this season.

    Biggest disappointment: Not that a round of 1 under is tragically disappointing, but Jordan Spieth has a pretty solid history of going low at this event and contending for the title. He's seven back through Round 1.

    Shot of the day: Satoshi Kodaira recorded the second albatross in tournament history when he holed a 3-iron from 234 yards at the first.

    Honorable mention: Na got into a pretty good back-and-forth with his caddie about whether to lay up or try to clear the water from the right rough at No. 9. Na went for it, avoided hazard, and holed this chip for birdie. 

    Quote of the day: "I told you." - Na, after his chip-in

    Golf Channel's NCAA Golf Coverage Continues Mon-Wed., May 28-30 With the NCAA Men's Golf Championships

    By Golf Channel Public RelationsMay 24, 2018, 10:24 pm

    Two National Championships to be Decided Over a Three-Day Span – Individual (Mon., May 28) and Team (Wed., May 30)

     Eight of the Top-10 Ranked Programs in the Country Set to Compete; Reigning NCAA Men’s National Champions Oklahoma and Current Top-Ranked Oklahoma State Paired Together Starting Friday

     Buick and Stifel Co-Presenting Sponsors of Golf Channel’s Coverage of the NCAA Women’s and Men’s Golf Championships

    ORLANDO, Fla., May 24, 2018 – Coming on the heels of Wednesday’s dramatic championship match where Arizona defeated Alabama in a playoff to claim their third women’s golf team national championship, Golf Channel returns to Karsten Creek Golf Club in Stillwater, Okla. next week for the 2018 NCAA Division I Men’s Golf National Championships. Taking place Monday-Wednesday, May 28-30, Golf Channel’s coverage will feature nearly 30 hours of live tournament and on-site wraparound news coverage, showcasing the top men’s college golf programs in the country.

    NCAA Men’s Golf Championships Coverage: Coverage begins on Monday, May 28 to crown the individual national champion and to track the teams attempting to qualify for the eight-team match play championship. Golf Channel’s coverage on Tuesday and Wednesday, May 29-30 will include all three rounds of the team match play, ultimately crowning a team national champion.

    In addition, Golf Central will surround live tournament action with pre-and post-event news coverage produced on-site at Karsten Creek Golf Club, as well as daily news updates on Morning Drive and online via Golf Channel Digital. News and tournament coverage also will be live streamed on Golf Channel Digital. College Central, Golf Channel’s online home for college golf, will provide comprehensive editorial coverage throughout the championships.

    Golf Channel NCAA Men’s Golf Championships Coverage (all times ET)

    Monday, May   28

    Individual   National Championship

    4-8 p.m.   (Live)

    Tuesday, May   29

    Quarterfinals,   Team Match Play

    11   a.m.-1:30 p.m. (Live)

    Tuesday,   May 29

    Semifinals,   Team Match Play

    4-8 p.m.   (Live)

    Wednesday, May   30

    Team Match   Play National Championship

    4-8 p.m.   (Live)

    Stifel and Buick Sign on as Co-Presenting Sponsors for Golf Channel’s NCAA Golf Championships Tournament Coverage: New for 2018, Stifel Financial Corp. and Buick have signed on as co-presenting sponsors for Golf Channel’s tournament coverage of the 2018 NCAA Women’s and Men’s Golf Championships. In addition, Stifel has extended its partnership with the Fred Haskins Commission, Golf Channel and Golfweek as presenting sponsor of the Fred Haskins Award, given annually to nation’s outstanding male collegiate golfer.Golf Channel will announce the Fred Haskins Award presented by Stifel following the conclusion of the NCAA Men’s Golf Championships, on a live edition of Golf Central, Wednesday, June 6 at 6 p.m. ET. The show will include profiles on the top candidates for the award and a live interview with the winner, who also will receive an exemption to compete in the 2018 Greenbrier Classic on the PGA TOUR. The Haskins Award honors the nation’s most outstanding male Division I collegiate golfer as selected by his peers, coaches and the golf media.

    Semifinal Teams in Match Play to Receive Invitations to Compete in East Lake Cup: The East Lake Cup, taking place in late October at historic East Lake Golf Club, will feature the top-performing teams from the 2018 NCAA Women’s and Men’s Golf Championships. Invitations for the field have been extended to Arizona, Alabama, Southern California and Stanford – semifinalists in the NCAA Women’s Golf Championships, and also will be extended to the semifinalists in the Men’s Championships. Modeled after the NCAA Golf Championships, the format for the East Lake Cup consists of an opening round of stroke play to crown an individual male and female champion and determine seeding for the following two days of match play competition. Golf Channel will air live coverage of the East Lake Cup Monday-Wednesday, Oct. 29-31.

    College Central – Golf Channel Digital Coverage: Golf Channel will provide comprehensive coverage via College Central,Golf Channel Digital’s home for college golf. Led by Jay Coffin, and Ryan Lavner, College Central will be the source for all things college golf, including tournament results and scores, features and columns, video highlights and breaking news.

    Getty Images

    Country singer Owen shoots 86 in Web.com debut

    By Will GrayMay 24, 2018, 7:51 pm

    Country music star Jake Owen struggled in his Web.com Tour debut, shooting a 14-over 86 in the opening round of the Nashville Golf Open.

    Owen, who played as a 1 handicap earlier this year while teaming with Jordan Spieth at the AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am, put three balls out of bounds over his first nine holes, including two en route to a quadruple-bogey 9 on the par-5 18th hole. After making the turn in 46, Owen came home in 40 without making a single birdie.

    Owen is playing as an amateur on an unrestricted sponsor exemption, the same type used by NBA superstar Steph Curry on the Web.com Tour last year and by former NFL quarterback Tony Romo this year on the PGA Tour. Curry missed the cut after rounds of 74-74 at the Ellie Mae Classic, while Romo shot 77-82 at the Corales Punta Cana Resort & Club Championship.

    Full-field scores from the Nashville Golf Open

    Owen tallied nine pars, six bogeys, two doubles and a quad in his opener and was the only player from the morning wave who failed to break 80. The closest player to him in the standings was two-time major champ Angel Cabrera, who opened with a 79.

    While Owen struggled against a field full of professionals, he took the setback in stride and even took to Twitter in the middle of his round to fire back at some of his online critics: